373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8981194)
1. Women and health research: working for change.
Baylis F
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 8981194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. There is no women's health crisis.
Satel SL
Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wanted. Single, white male for medical research.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 1544796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Women's health research: policy and practice.
Ickovics JR; Epel ES
IRB; 1993; 15(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex & gender: the politics, policy, and practice of medical research.
Keitt SK
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2003; 3(2):253-78. PubMed ID: 14577143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical gender bias and managed care.
MacDougall VL
Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2002; 27(3):781-910. PubMed ID: 15478255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research.
Keville TD
Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Women of childbearing potential in clinical research: perspectives on NIH policy and liability issues.
Hayunga EG; Rothenberg KH; Pinn VW
Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1996 Jan; 13(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why should we include women and minorities in randomized controlled trials?
Weijer C; Crouch RA
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 10633280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The sex-bias myth in medicine.
Kadar AG
Atl Mon; 1994 Aug; 274(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11659876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials.
Weijer C
IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feminism's healing effect.
Bender L
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11644537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women not shortchanged in trials?
Holden C
Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5306):1571-3. PubMed ID: 11644903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Women and health research.
Merton V
J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 7749484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
Gorenberg H; White A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new reproductive technologies: a technological handmaid's tale.
National Action Committee on the Status of Women (Canada)
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 11651221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Minority recruitment and participation in health research.
Corbie-Smith GM
N C Med J; 2004; 65(6):385-7. PubMed ID: 15714732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH push for women's health.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1991 Oct; 353(6343):383. PubMed ID: 1896080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hispanic research: implications of the National Institutes of Health guidelines on inclusion of women and minorities in clinical research.
Caban CE
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):165-9. PubMed ID: 8562217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
