These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8982459)

  • 1. Phylogenetic analysis in molecular evolutionary genetics.
    Nei M
    Annu Rev Genet; 1996; 30():371-403. PubMed ID: 8982459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using models of nucleotide evolution to build phylogenetic trees.
    Bos DH; Posada D
    Dev Comp Immunol; 2005; 29(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 15572070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences.
    Hall BG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):792-802. PubMed ID: 15590907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ancestral sequence alignment under optimal conditions.
    Hudek AK; Brown DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():273. PubMed ID: 16293191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring ancestral sequences in taxon-rich phylogenies.
    Gascuel O; Steel M
    Math Biosci; 2010 Oct; 227(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 20627110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of fast phylogenetic methods for large datasets.
    Nakhleh L; Moret BM; Roshan U; St John K; Sun J; Warnow T
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2002; ():211-22. PubMed ID: 11928477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False-positive selection identified by ML-based methods: examples from the Sig1 gene of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax gene of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus.
    Suzuki Y; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 May; 21(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 15014169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):980-4. PubMed ID: 15496922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood, parsimony, and heterogeneous evolution.
    Spencer M; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1161-4. PubMed ID: 15746012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracies of ancestral amino acid sequences inferred by the parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Zhang J; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 1997; 44 Suppl 1():S139-46. PubMed ID: 9071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of Parsimony, Likelihood, and Bayesian approaches.
    Leaché AD; Reeder TW
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):44-68. PubMed ID: 11943092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting.
    Desper R; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Mar; 21(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 14694080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study in ancestral range reconstruction methods: retracing the uncertain histories of insular lineages.
    Clark JR; Ree RH; Alfaro ME; King MG; Wagner WL; Roalson EH
    Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 18853357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic inference from conserved sites alignments.
    Grundy WN; Naylor GJ
    J Exp Zool; 1999 Aug; 285(2):128-39. PubMed ID: 10440724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.