These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8982579)

  • 1. Upgrading unsatisfactory cervical smears with the MiB-1 method.
    Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Wijsman-Grootendorst A; Hoogeveen MM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Nov; 15(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 8982579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of MiB-1 staining in smears with atypical glandular cells.
    Boon ME; Vinkestein A; van Binsbergen-Ingelse A; van Haaften C
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Aug; 31(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15282717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
    Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of atypical reserve cell hyperplasia in cervical smears and its diagnostic significance.
    Boon ME; van Dunné FM; Vardaxis NJ
    Mod Pathol; 1995 Sep; 8(7):786-94. PubMed ID: 8539239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
    Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PAPNET for analysis of proliferating (MIB-1 positive) cell populations in cervical smears.
    Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E
    Eur J Morphol; 1994 Mar; 32(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 8086271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
    Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proliferation patterns of cervical cells as visualized in Leiden liquid cytology slides.
    Luzzatto L; van Haaften C; Boon ME
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jul; 31(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 15236256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
    Wagner D; Noltenius HW
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
    Bayrle W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
    Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples.
    Boon ME; Zeppa P; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Kok LP
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 1994636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
    Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effectiveness of cervical cytology screening for cervical cancer (author's transl)].
    Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Sep; 104(38):1331-5. PubMed ID: 477559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Appraisal of self-collected cervical specimens in cytologic screening of uterine cancer.
    Arata T; Sekiba K; Kato K
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 277040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MIB-1 expression in cervical Papanicolaou tests correlates with dysplasia in subsequent cervical biopsies.
    Zeng Z; Del PG; Cohen JM; Mittal K
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2002 Mar; 10(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11893030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.