137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8982579)
1. Upgrading unsatisfactory cervical smears with the MiB-1 method.
Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Wijsman-Grootendorst A; Hoogeveen MM
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Nov; 15(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 8982579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of MiB-1 staining in smears with atypical glandular cells.
Boon ME; Vinkestein A; van Binsbergen-Ingelse A; van Haaften C
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Aug; 31(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15282717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recognition of atypical reserve cell hyperplasia in cervical smears and its diagnostic significance.
Boon ME; van Dunné FM; Vardaxis NJ
Mod Pathol; 1995 Sep; 8(7):786-94. PubMed ID: 8539239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Pairwuti S
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PAPNET for analysis of proliferating (MIB-1 positive) cell populations in cervical smears.
Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E
Eur J Morphol; 1994 Mar; 32(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 8086271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proliferation patterns of cervical cells as visualized in Leiden liquid cytology slides.
Luzzatto L; van Haaften C; Boon ME
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jul; 31(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 15236256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
Wagner D; Noltenius HW
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
Bayrle W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples.
Boon ME; Zeppa P; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Kok LP
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 1994636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The effectiveness of cervical cytology screening for cervical cancer (author's transl)].
Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Sep; 104(38):1331-5. PubMed ID: 477559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appraisal of self-collected cervical specimens in cytologic screening of uterine cancer.
Arata T; Sekiba K; Kato K
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 277040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MIB-1 expression in cervical Papanicolaou tests correlates with dysplasia in subsequent cervical biopsies.
Zeng Z; Del PG; Cohen JM; Mittal K
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2002 Mar; 10(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11893030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
