225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8985586)
1. Justice, society, physicians and ethics committees: incorporating ideas of justice into patient care decisions.
Loewy EH
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(4):559-69. PubMed ID: 8985586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anchor and course for the modern ship of casuistry.
Macpherson-Smith M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 7994464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics committees and resource allocation.
Lantos JD
Bioethics Forum; 1994; 10(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 11652876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The public context of private medical decisions.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 8089000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Liberalism and medical ethics.
Daniels N
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):41-3. PubMed ID: 11643038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The common good in a secular society: the relevance of a Roman Catholic notion to the healthcare allocation debate.
Lustig BA
J Med Philos; 1993 Dec; 18(6):569-87. PubMed ID: 8151239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liberalism, communitarianism, and medical ethics.
Brody BA
Law Soc Inq; 1993; 18(2):393-407. PubMed ID: 11660010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Healthcare ethics committees: re-examining their social and moral functions.
Engelhardt HT
HEC Forum; 1999 Jun; 11(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 11184855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics of caring and the institutional ethics committee.
Sichel BA
Hypatia; 1989; 4(2):45-56. PubMed ID: 11650330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The search for ethical symmetry in health care reform: individual preference vs. societal need.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1993; 8(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 11656242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Some criteria for making decisions concerning the distribution of scarce medical resources.
Young R
Theory Decis; 1975 Nov; 6(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 11664531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Allocating medical resources and Medicaid: raising the issues from a psychological jurisprudential perspective.
Campbell E; Murphy-Berman V; Berman J
UMKC Law Rev; 1992; 60(4):665-715. PubMed ID: 11659951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining the medical sphere.
Trappenburg MJ
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(4):416-34. PubMed ID: 9292218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics committees across a continuum of care.
Moss R
HEC Forum; 1995 Jul; 7(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 10151104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical care of children: the ethics of using contested and expensive medical resources.
Thomasma DC; Griffin A
Linacre Q; 1983 Feb; 50(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 11649498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Urban bioethics.
Cecire VR; Blustein J; Fleischman AR
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2000 Mar; 10(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11658150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Renewing the covenant with patients and society.
Bernardin J
Linacre Q; 1996 Feb; 63(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 11653353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioethics: private choice and common good.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 8089005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Moral values in health care reform: implications for family practice.
Brody H
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1994; 7(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 8059628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New voices ask to be heard in bioethics.
Phillips DF
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 1342346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
