These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8985615)

  • 1. Interviewing children who may have been traumatized.
    Jones DP
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1249-50. PubMed ID: 8985615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case study: allegations of abuse created in a single interview.
    Bernet W
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1997 Jul; 36(7):966-70. PubMed ID: 9204675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
    Samra J; Yuille JC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of developmental research for interviewing children.
    Steward MS; Bussey K; Goodman GS; Saywitz KJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 1993; 17(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 8435783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semistructured child sexual abuse interviews: interview and child characteristics related to credibility of disclosure.
    Wood B; Orsak C; Murphy M; Cross HJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Jan; 20(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 8640430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating children's reports of sexual abuse: results from a survey of professionals.
    Conte JR; Sorenson E; Fogarty L; Dalla Rosa J
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1991 Jul; 61(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 1951650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Assessing credibility in suspected sexual abuse of children].
    Volbert R
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr; 1995 Mar; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 7771120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the Effects of a Service-Trained Facility Dog on Stress in Children Undergoing Forensic Interview for Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse.
    Krause-Parello CA; Thames M; Ray CM; Kolassa J
    J Child Sex Abus; 2018 Apr; 27(3):305-320. PubMed ID: 29533149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Police interviews with child sexual abuse victims: patterns of reporting, avoidance and denial.
    Leander L
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Mar; 34(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 20206999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Youth self-report of physical and sexual abuse: a latent class analysis.
    Nooner KB; Litrownik AJ; Thompson R; Margolis B; English DJ; Knight ED; Everson MD; Roesch S
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Mar; 34(3):146-54. PubMed ID: 20207000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexualized doll play.
    Sonnenschein K; Licamele W
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1991 Jul; 30(4):694-5. PubMed ID: 1890108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual abuse of children--a primer for physicians.
    Shubin CI
    Md Med J; 1994 Apr; 43(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 8007791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.
    Schaeffer P; Leventhal JM; Asnes AG
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 May; 35(5):343-52. PubMed ID: 21620161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomical dolls: their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused.
    Faller KC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2005; 14(3):1-21. PubMed ID: 16203692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental differences in detection and disclosure of sexual abuse.
    Campis LB; Hebden-Curtis J; DeMaso DR
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1993 Sep; 32(5):920-4. PubMed ID: 8407764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interviewing children versus tossing coins: accurately assessing the diagnosticity of children's disclosures of abuse.
    Lyon TD; Ahern EC; Scurich N
    J Child Sex Abus; 2012; 21(1):19-44. PubMed ID: 22339423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How sexual abuse interviews go astray: implications for prosecutors, police, and child protection services.
    Wood JM; Garven S
    Child Maltreat; 2000 May; 5(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 11232084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.