206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8985617)
1. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
Samra J; Yuille JC
Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event.
Goodman GS; Aman C
Child Dev; 1990 Dec; 61(6):1859-71. PubMed ID: 2083502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls.
Katz SM; Schonfeld DJ; Carter AS; Leventhal JM; Cicchetti DV
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1995 Apr; 16(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 7790517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nearly 4 years after an event: children's eyewitness memory and adults' perceptions of children's accuracy.
Goodman GS; Batterman-Faunce JM; Schaaf JM; Kenney R
Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Aug; 26(8):849-84. PubMed ID: 12363335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interviewing young children about body touch and handling.
Steward MS; Steward DS
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1996; 61(4-5):1-214. PubMed ID: 8972588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls.
White S; Strom GA; Santilli G; Halpin BM
Child Abuse Negl; 1986; 10(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 3791029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
Glaser D; Collins C
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the eyewitness accounts of deaf and hearing children.
Porter S; Yuille JC; Bent A
Child Abuse Negl; 1995 Jan; 19(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 7895144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: developmental and gender comparisons.
Bruck M; Ceci SJ; Francoeur E
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Mar; 6(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10937313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of anatomical dolls as a demonstration aid in child sexual abuse interviews: a study of forensic interviewers' perceptions.
Hlavka HR; Olinger SD; Lashley JL
J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):519-53. PubMed ID: 20924909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A missing link in suggestibility research: what is known about the behavior of field interviewers in unstructured interviews with young children?
Gilstrap LL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15053699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement among professionals about a child's sexual abuse status: interviews with sexually anatomically correct dolls as indicators of abuse.
Realmuto GM; Wescoe S
Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 1393730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpreting children's labels for sex-related body parts of anatomically explicit dolls.
Schor DP; Sivan AB
Child Abuse Negl; 1989; 13(4):523-31. PubMed ID: 2819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remembering and reporting by children: the influence of cues and props.
Salmon K
Clin Psychol Rev; 2001 Mar; 21(2):267-300. PubMed ID: 11293368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing Children's Credibility in Courtroom Investigations of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse: Suggestibility, Plausibility, and Consistency.
Denne E; Sullivan C; Ernest K; Stolzenberg SN
Child Maltreat; 2020 May; 25(2):224-232. PubMed ID: 31495202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
