These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8985617)

  • 1. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
    Samra J; Yuille JC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event.
    Goodman GS; Aman C
    Child Dev; 1990 Dec; 61(6):1859-71. PubMed ID: 2083502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls.
    Katz SM; Schonfeld DJ; Carter AS; Leventhal JM; Cicchetti DV
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1995 Apr; 16(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 7790517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
    DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nearly 4 years after an event: children's eyewitness memory and adults' perceptions of children's accuracy.
    Goodman GS; Batterman-Faunce JM; Schaaf JM; Kenney R
    Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Aug; 26(8):849-84. PubMed ID: 12363335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interviewing young children about body touch and handling.
    Steward MS; Steward DS
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1996; 61(4-5):1-214. PubMed ID: 8972588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls.
    White S; Strom GA; Santilli G; Halpin BM
    Child Abuse Negl; 1986; 10(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 3791029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the eyewitness accounts of deaf and hearing children.
    Porter S; Yuille JC; Bent A
    Child Abuse Negl; 1995 Jan; 19(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 7895144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: developmental and gender comparisons.
    Bruck M; Ceci SJ; Francoeur E
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Mar; 6(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10937313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of anatomical dolls as a demonstration aid in child sexual abuse interviews: a study of forensic interviewers' perceptions.
    Hlavka HR; Olinger SD; Lashley JL
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):519-53. PubMed ID: 20924909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A missing link in suggestibility research: what is known about the behavior of field interviewers in unstructured interviews with young children?
    Gilstrap LL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15053699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement among professionals about a child's sexual abuse status: interviews with sexually anatomically correct dolls as indicators of abuse.
    Realmuto GM; Wescoe S
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 1393730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting children's labels for sex-related body parts of anatomically explicit dolls.
    Schor DP; Sivan AB
    Child Abuse Negl; 1989; 13(4):523-31. PubMed ID: 2819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remembering and reporting by children: the influence of cues and props.
    Salmon K
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2001 Mar; 21(2):267-300. PubMed ID: 11293368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing Children's Credibility in Courtroom Investigations of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse: Suggestibility, Plausibility, and Consistency.
    Denne E; Sullivan C; Ernest K; Stolzenberg SN
    Child Maltreat; 2020 May; 25(2):224-232. PubMed ID: 31495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.