These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8985994)

  • 21. Functional gait asymmetry of unilateral transfemoral amputees.
    Schaarschmidt M; Lipfert SW; Meier-Gratz C; Scholle HC; Seyfarth A
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):907-17. PubMed ID: 22248566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of laterality on obstacle crossing performance in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.
    De Asha AR; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2015 May; 30(4):343-6. PubMed ID: 25779690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control.
    Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
    Clin Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 19(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 15929508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speed-dependent variations of lower-limb joint angles during walking. A graphic computerized method showing individual patterns.
    Frigo C; Tesio L
    Am J Phys Med; 1986 Apr; 65(2):51-62. PubMed ID: 3963165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.
    Vrieling AH; van Keeken HG; Schoppen T; Otten E; Halbertsma JP; Hof AL; Postema K
    Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 18242995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maximum Swing Flexion or Gait Symmetry: A Comparative Evaluation of Control Targets on Metabolic Energy Expenditure of Amputee Using Intelligent Prosthetic Knee.
    Cao W; Zhao W; Yu H; Chen W; Meng Q
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2898546. PubMed ID: 30584532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
    Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: a comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis.
    Narita H; Yokogushi K; Shii S; Kakizawa M; Nosaka T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9453088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Successful prosthetic fitting of elderly trans-femoral amputees with Intelligent Prosthesis (IP): a clinical pilot study.
    Chin T; Maeda Y; Sawamura S; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 17979012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intention detection of gait initiation using EMG and kinematic data.
    Wentink EC; Beijen SI; Hermens HJ; Rietman JS; Veltink PH
    Gait Posture; 2013 Feb; 37(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 22917647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Obstacle crossing in lower limb amputees.
    Vrieling AH; van Keeken HG; Schoppen T; Otten E; Halbertsma JP; Hof AL; Postema K
    Gait Posture; 2007 Oct; 26(4):587-94. PubMed ID: 17275306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of gait using a Multiflex foot versus a Quantum foot in knee disarticulation amputees.
    Boonstra AM; Fidler V; Spits GM; Tuil P; Hof AL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 8233774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
    Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodology for determining the sensitivity of swing leg toe clearance and leg length to swing leg joint angles during gait.
    Moosabhoy MA; Gard SA
    Gait Posture; 2006 Dec; 24(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 16439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding adaptive gait in lower-limb amputees: insights from multivariate analyses.
    Buckley JG; De Asha AR; Johnson L; Beggs CB
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 10():98. PubMed ID: 23958032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Benchmark data for elderly, vascular trans-tibial amputees after rehabilitation.
    Hubbard WA; McElroy GK
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Dec; 18(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 7724347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stride kinematics and knee joint kinetics of child amputee gait.
    Hoy MG; Whiting WC; Zernicke RF
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1982 Feb; 63(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 7059274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accelerations due to impact at heel strike using below-knee prosthesis.
    Van Jaarsveld HW; Grootenboer HJ; De Vries J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Aug; 14(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2235301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Planar covariation of elevation angles in prosthetic gait.
    Leurs F; Bengoetxea A; Cebolla AM; De Saedeleer C; Dan B; Cheron G
    Gait Posture; 2012 Apr; 35(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 22257927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lower-limb proprioception in above-knee amputees.
    Eakin CL; Quesada PM; Skinner H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Nov; (284):239-46. PubMed ID: 1395300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.