These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8986054)

  • 1. The influence of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile.
    Katsaros C; Ripplinger B; Högel A; Berg R
    J Orofac Orthop; 1996 Dec; 57(6):354-65. PubMed ID: 8986054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental and soft tissue changes following extraction of second premolars in females with bimaxillary protrusion: A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alqasir A; Al-Jewair T; Almoammar K; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32788489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients.
    Xu TM; Liu Y; Yang MZ; Huang W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):672-7. PubMed ID: 16679208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
    Bravo LA
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
    Devereux L; Moles D; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e175-81. PubMed ID: 21300228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Khan M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jul; 20(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 20642945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions.
    Kocadereli I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jul; 122(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 12142899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction.
    Omar Z; Short L; Banting DW; Saltaji H
    Int Orthod; 2018 Mar; 16(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 29478932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Profile changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic treatment in a pair of identical twins.
    Katsaros C
    J Orofac Orthop; 1996 Feb; 57(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 8626171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change in the soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment.
    Akin N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 9582639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment.
    Tadic N; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Saelens NA; De Smit AA
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 9699401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.
    Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The extraction of permanent second molars and its effect on the dentofacial complex of patients treated with the Tip-Edge appliance.
    Greatrex PA; Sampson WJ; Richards LC; Twelftree CC
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):501-18. PubMed ID: 12407946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.