149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8986530)
1. Comparison of the reproducibility of the WHO classifications of 1975 and 1994 of endometrial hyperplasia.
Skov BG; Broholm H; Engel U; Franzmann MB; Nielsen AL; Lauritzen AF; Skov T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1997 Jan; 16(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 8986530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multicentric European study testing the reproducibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens.
Bergeron C; Nogales FF; Masseroli M; Abeler V; Duvillard P; Müller-Holzner E; Pickartz H; Wells M
Am J Surg Pathol; 1999 Sep; 23(9):1102-8. PubMed ID: 10478671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expert system support using a Bayesian belief network for the classification of endometrial hyperplasia.
Morrison ML; McCluggage WG; Price GJ; Diamond J; Sheeran MR; Mulholland KM; Walsh MY; Montironi R; Bartels PH; Thompson D; Hamilton PW
J Pathol; 2002 Jul; 197(3):403-14. PubMed ID: 12115888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of current classifications of endometrial endometrioid glandular proliferations: further evidence supporting a simplified classification.
Ordi J; Bergeron C; Hardisson D; McCluggage WG; Hollema H; Felix A; Soslow RA; Oliva E; Tavassoli FA; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Wells M; Nogales FF
Histopathology; 2014 Jan; 64(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 24111732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study on the morphology and reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial lesions utilizing liquid-based cytology.
Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Mentzelopoulou P; Tsiveleka A; Kyroudes A; Voulgaris Z; Tzonou A; Karakitsos P
Cancer; 2005 Apr; 105(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 15751019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia subgroups and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma in endometrial curettage specimens.
Izadi-Mood N; Khaniki M; Irvanloo G; Ahmadi SA; Hayeri H; Meysamie A
Arch Iran Med; 2009 Jul; 12(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19566355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-observer reproducibility of endometrial cytology by the Osaki Study Group method: utilising the Becton Dickinson SurePath
Norimatsu Y; Yamaguchi T; Taira T; Abe H; Sakamoto H; Takenaka M; Yanoh K; Yoshinobu M; Irino S; Hirai Y; Kobayashi TK
Cytopathology; 2016 Dec; 27(6):472-478. PubMed ID: 27109167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma.
Kendall BS; Ronnett BM; Isacson C; Cho KR; Hedrick L; Diener-West M; Kurman RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1998 Aug; 22(8):1012-9. PubMed ID: 9706982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Zaino RJ; Kauderer J; Trimble CL; Silverberg SG; Curtin JP; Lim PC; Gallup DG
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 16400640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia: why is it so difficult to agree?
Allison KH; Reed SD; Voigt LF; Jordan CD; Newton KM; Garcia RL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 18347507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of biopsy diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia: evidence supporting a simplified classification.
Sherman ME; Ronnett BM; Ioffe OB; Richesson DA; Rush BB; Glass AG; Chatterjee N; Duggan MA; Lacey JV
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jul; 27(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 18580308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia (EIN) in endometrial biopsy specimens categorized by the 1994 World Health Organization classification for endometrial hyperplasia.
Li XC; Song WJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5935-9. PubMed ID: 24289604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Papillary proliferation of the endometrium: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases of simple and complex papillae without cytologic atypia.
Ip PP; Irving JA; McCluggage WG; Clement PB; Young RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 23211295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer variability in endometrial cytology using kappa statistics.
Tezuka F; Namiki T; Higashiiwai H
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Apr; 45(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 1577966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pax2 expression in simultaneously diagnosed WHO and EIN classification systems.
Joiner AK; Quick CM; Jeffus SK
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25473752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Congruence Between 1994 WHO Classification of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia System.
Travaglino A; Raffone A; Saccone G; Mascolo M; Guida M; Mollo A; Insabato L; Zullo F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2020 Jan; 153(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31433834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential of the learning vector quantizer in the cell classification of endometrial lesions in postmenopausal women.
Karakitsos P; Kyroudes A; Pouliakis A; Stergiou EB; Voulgaris Z; Kittas C
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2002 Feb; 24(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 11865947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Histopathological diagnosis and clinical significance of endometrial hyperplasia].
Janjić M; Sulović V; Nesić S; Radojković M
Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1979; 19(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 550015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endometrial hyperplasia.
Mills AM; Longacre TA
Semin Diagn Pathol; 2010 Nov; 27(4):199-214. PubMed ID: 21309256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
