BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8988694)

  • 1. Preventing Rhesus D haemolytic disease of the newborn by giving anti-D immunoglobulin: are the guidelines being adequately followed?
    Howard HL; Martlew VJ; McFadyen IR; Clarke CA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jan; 104(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 8988694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preventing rhesus D haemolytic disease of the newborn by giving anti-D immunoglobulin: are the guidelines being adequately followed?
    Harding K
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):869-70. PubMed ID: 9236664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of Rh alloimmunization.
    Fung Kee Fung K; Eason E; Crane J; Armson A; De La Ronde S; Farine D; Keenan-Lindsay L; Leduc L; Reid GJ; Aerde JV; Wilson RD; Davies G; Désilets VA; Summers A; Wyatt P; Young DC;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 Sep; 25(9):765-73. PubMed ID: 12970812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of NICE recommendation for a policy of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis: a survey of UK maternity units.
    Harkness M; Freer Y; Prescott RJ; Warner P
    Transfus Med; 2008 Oct; 18(5):292-5. PubMed ID: 18937736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The scientific basis of antenatal prophylaxis.
    Urbaniak SJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Nov; 105 Suppl 18():11-8. PubMed ID: 9863973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haemolytic disease of the newborn: the new NICE guidelines.
    Thompson J
    J Fam Health Care; 2002; 12(5):133-6. PubMed ID: 12449064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causes and clinical consequences of Rhesus (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn: a study of a Scottish population, 1985-1990.
    Hughes RG; Craig JI; Murphy WG; Greer IA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 8199074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. Revised guidelines advocate two doses of anti-D immunoglobulin for antenatal prophylaxis.
    Lee D
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7144):1611. PubMed ID: 9596614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factors for RhD immunisation despite antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis.
    Koelewijn JM; de Haas M; Vrijkotte TG; van der Schoot CE; Bonsel GJ
    BJOG; 2009 Sep; 116(10):1307-14. PubMed ID: 19538414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A case for the antenatal administration of anti-D immunoglobulin to primigravidae.
    Tovey LA; Taverner JM
    Lancet; 1981 Apr; 1(8225):878-81. PubMed ID: 6112301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The issue of anti-D: an integrated seamless approach from recognition of need to bedside administration.
    Ryan MJ; Joyce S; O'Brien N; Lynch E; Burke G; Cahill MR
    Ir J Med Sci; 2005; 174(3):58-63. PubMed ID: 16285341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in the treatment of threatened miscarriage in the accident and emergency department.
    Weinberg L
    Emerg Med J; 2001 Nov; 18(6):444-7. PubMed ID: 11696491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen.
    Chaffe B; Ford J; Bills V
    Transfus Med; 2007 Oct; 17(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 17903141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of first trimester non-invasive fetal RHD screening for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in RhD-negative pregnant women: a model-based analysis.
    Neovius M; Tiblad E; Westgren M; Kublickas M; Neovius K; Wikman A
    BJOG; 2016 Jul; 123(8):1337-46. PubMed ID: 26663771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Lloyd Jones M; Wight J; Forman K; Wray J; Beverley C
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):903-7. PubMed ID: 15327602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Adverse effects and patient information].
    Cortey A; Brossard Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S112-1S118. PubMed ID: 16495836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and long term effects of antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin.
    Thornton JG; Page C; Foote G; Arthur GR; Tovey LA; Scott JS
    BMJ; 1989 Jun; 298(6689):1671-3. PubMed ID: 2547468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of the rhesus prevention programme: a prospective study.
    Ghosh S; Murphy WG
    Scott Med J; 1994 Oct; 39(5):147-9. PubMed ID: 8778974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intramuscular versus intravenous anti-D for preventing Rhesus alloimmunization during pregnancy.
    Okwundu CI; Afolabi BB
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jan; (1):CD007885. PubMed ID: 23440818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Routine antenatal Rhesus D immunoglobulin prophylaxis: the results of a prospective 10 year study.
    MacKenzie IZ; Bowell P; Gregory H; Pratt G; Guest C; Entwistle CC
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 May; 106(5):492-7. PubMed ID: 10430201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.