370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8989399)
1. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection.
Mills DM; Rubel EW
Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 77(1-2):183-99. PubMed ID: 7928730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
Hauser R; Probst R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):914-24. PubMed ID: 12597185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuronal response to cochlear distortion products in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the gerbil.
Faulstich M; Kössl M
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):491-502. PubMed ID: 9921673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
Rogers AR; Burke SR; Kopun JG; Tan H; Neely ST; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability.
Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2662-82. PubMed ID: 1479129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
Cooper NP; Rhode WS
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
