These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8989778)

  • 1. Prospects for automated cytology.
    Richart RM; Patten SF; Lee JS
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1996 Dec; 23(4):853-9. PubMed ID: 8989778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 9438458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When your patient asks: "Doctor, I read there have been serious Pap smear errors. Shouldn't I get one of those new computer Pap smears?".
    Boronow RC; Cavett JR
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1998 Apr; 39(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 9585689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ; Valente PT
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].
    Regitnig P; Nader A; Wiener H
    Pathologe; 2012 Jul; 33(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 22569927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AutoCyte SCREEN interactive automated primary cytology screening system. A preliminary evaluation.
    Takahashi M; Kimura M; Akagi A; Naitoh M
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 9479338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
    Koss LG; Sherman ME; Cohen MB; Anes AR; Darragh TM; Lemos LB; McClellan BJ; Rosenthal DL; Keyhani-Rofagha S; Schreiber K; Valente PT
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technologic advances for evaluation of cervical cytology: is newer better?
    Hartmann KE; Nanda K; Hall S; Myers E
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2001 Dec; 56(12):765-74. PubMed ID: 11753179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Pap smear, automated rescreening, and negligent nondisclosure.
    Godfrey SE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jan; 111(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 9894449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 9438459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
    Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
    Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid cervicovaginal smear screening: method of quality control and assessing individual cytotechnologist performance.
    Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Skopljanac-Macina L; Antulov J; Barisić A; Milicić-Juhas V
    Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 16719854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An interlaboratory study of the use of PapNet in the quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
    Cosentino A; Ghidoni D; Salemi M; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Zani J; Grasso G; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1999 Apr; 91(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 10484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abnormal Pap smears with negative follow-up biopsies: improving cytohistologic correlations.
    Bewtra C; Pathan M; Hashish H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 14506671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences between false-negative and true-positive Papanicolaou smears on Papnet-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Aug; 19(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 9702494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.