BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8990516)

  • 21. Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication.
    Kaifu Y; Baba H; Sutikna T; Morwood MJ; Kubo D; Saptomo EW; Jatmiko ; Awe RD; Djubiantono T
    J Hum Evol; 2011 Dec; 61(6):644-82. PubMed ID: 22036083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The 'temporal effect' in hominids: Reinvestigating the nature of support for a chimp-human clade in bone morphology.
    Pearson A; Groves C; Cardini A
    J Hum Evol; 2015 Nov; 88():146-159. PubMed ID: 26363669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Berge C; Penin X
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15160366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Towards the restoration of ancient hominid craniofacial anatomy: Chimpanzee morphology reveals covariation between craniometrics and facial soft tissue thickness.
    Campbell RM; Vinas G; Henneberg M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0245760. PubMed ID: 34086683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes.
    Mitteroecker P; Gunz P; Bookstein FL
    Evol Dev; 2005; 7(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 15876197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Basicranial ontogeny comparison in Pan troglodytes and Homo sapiens and its use for developmental stage definition of KNM-ER 42700.
    Mori T; Harvati K
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Dec; 170(4):579-594. PubMed ID: 31633198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brief communication: foramen magnum-carotid foramina relationship: is it useful for species designation?
    Schaefer MS
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Dec; 110(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 10564576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The shape of the hominoid proximal femur: a geometric morphometric analysis.
    Harmon EH
    J Anat; 2007 Feb; 210(2):170-85. PubMed ID: 17310545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A geometric morphometric analysis of the medial tibial condyle of African hominids.
    Sylvester AD
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2013 Oct; 296(10):1518-25. PubMed ID: 23956043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integration between the face and the mandible of Pongo and the evolution of the craniofacial morphology of orangutans.
    Neaux D; Gilissen E; Coudyzer W; Guy F
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 Nov; 158(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 26174601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Size, shape, and asymmetry in fossil hominins: the status of the LB1 cranium based on 3D morphometric analyses.
    Baab KL; McNulty KP
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Nov; 57(5):608-22. PubMed ID: 19062073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Midsagittal Brain Variation among Non-Human Primates: Insights into Evolutionary Expansion of the Human Precuneus.
    Pereira-Pedro AS; Rilling JK; Chen X; Preuss TM; Bruner E
    Brain Behav Evol; 2017; 90(3):255-263. PubMed ID: 29065406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A geometric morphometric analysis of heterochrony in the cranium of chimpanzees and bonobos.
    Lieberman DE; Carlo J; Ponce de León M; Zollikofer CP
    J Hum Evol; 2007 Jun; 52(6):647-62. PubMed ID: 17298840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Ardipithecus ramidus skull and its implications for hominid origins.
    Suwa G; Asfaw B; Kono RT; Kubo D; Lovejoy CO; White TD
    Science; 2009 Oct; 326(5949):68e1-7. PubMed ID: 19810194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using geometric morphometric visualizations of directional selection gradients to investigate morphological differentiation.
    Weaver TD; Gunz P
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):838-850. PubMed ID: 29510468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The taxonomic implications of cranial shape variation in Homo erectus.
    Baab KL
    J Hum Evol; 2008 Jun; 54(6):827-47. PubMed ID: 18191986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patterns of craniofacial integration in extant Homo, Pan, and Gorilla.
    Polanski JM; Franciscus RG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Sep; 131(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 16552733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Morphological comparison of archaic Homo sapiens crania from China and Africa.
    Wu X; Bräuer G
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1993 Dec; 79(3):241-59. PubMed ID: 8128754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Covariation between the shape and mineralized tissues of the rib cross section in Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes and Sts 14.
    López-Rey JM; Cambra-Moo Ó; González Martín A; Candelas González N; Sánchez-Andrés Á; Tawane M; Cazenave M; Williams SA; Bastir M; García-Martínez D
    Am J Biol Anthropol; 2024 Jan; 183(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 37724468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter- and intra-specific variation in the ontogeny of the hominoid facial skeleton: testing assumptions of ontogenetic variability.
    Vioarsdóttir US; Cobb S
    Ann Anat; 2004 Dec; 186(5-6):423-8. PubMed ID: 15646274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.