These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8990633)

  • 1. A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces.
    Elias JJ; Brunski JB; Scarton HA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 8990633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.
    Meredith N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 9922740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone formation at recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated titanium implants in the posterior mandible (Type II bone) in dogs.
    Wikesjö UM; Xiropaidis AV; Qahash M; Lim WH; Sorensen RG; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Hall J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 35(11):985-91. PubMed ID: 18976395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis.
    Huang HM; Pan LC; Lee SY; Chiu CL; Fan KH; Ho KN
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 10982948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro and in vivo performance of a novel surface treatment to enhance osseointegration of endosseous implants.
    Chiesa R; Giavaresi G; Fini M; Sandrini E; Giordano C; Bianchi A; Giardino R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jun; 103(6):745-56. PubMed ID: 17197210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective observations on the influence of bone type in determining the nature of bone implant interface.
    Chiarenza AR
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1989; 6(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2519537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
    Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone formation at recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated titanium implants in the posterior maxilla (Type IV bone) in non-human primates.
    Wikesjö UM; Huang YH; Xiropaidis AV; Sorensen RG; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Wozney JM; Hall J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 35(11):992-1000. PubMed ID: 18976396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of performance of root-form endosseous implants placed in the maxillary sinus.
    Boyne PJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1993; 3(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10146541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mineralization at the interface of implants.
    Joos U; Wiesmann HP; Szuwart T; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):783-90. PubMed ID: 16697141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review.
    Sykaras N; Iacopino AM; Marker VA; Triplett RG; Woody RD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):675-90. PubMed ID: 11055135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.
    Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Jayaranan M; Joos U; Meyer U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 16164455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
    Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone.
    Huang YH; Xiropaidis AV; Sorensen RG; Albandar JM; Hall J; Wikesjö UM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 15642037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of bone-implant integration: efficiency and precision of 3 methods.
    McMillan PJ; Kim J; Garrett S; Crigger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):631-8. PubMed ID: 10531734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective analysis of 44 implants with no rotational primary stability used for fixed prosthesis anchorage.
    Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):467-71. PubMed ID: 17622014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.