These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8992476)
1. [Analysis program for quantitative detection of chromosome aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization]. Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I Pathologe; 1996 Sep; 17(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 8992476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image analysis for comparative genomic hybridization based on a karyotyping program for windows. Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Dec; 19(6):461-74. PubMed ID: 9893900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative genomic hybridization based strategy for the analysis of different chromosome imbalances detected in conventional cytogenetic diagnostics. Tönnies H; Stumm M; Wegner RD; Chudoba I; Kalscheuer V; Neitzel H Cytogenet Cell Genet; 2001; 93(3-4):188-94. PubMed ID: 11528111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative genomic hybridization: technical development and cytogenetic aspects for routine use in clinical laboratories. Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Da Silva F; Collot N; Hervy N; Wiss J; Tachdjian G Ann Genet; 1998; 41(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 9599653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative genomic hybridization. A screening method in genetic tumor diagnosis]. Petersen I; Schwendel A; Bockmühl U; Dietel M Pathologe; 1996 Sep; 17(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 8992475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities. Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative genomic hybridization in pathology. A new molecular cytogenetic method]. Störkel S; Simon R; Brinkschmidt C; Gronwald J; Böcker W Pathologe; 1996 May; 17(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 8710789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals. Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Rose H; Maahr J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 9515715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative genomic hybridization-aided unraveling of complex karyotypes in human hematopoietic neoplasias. Verdorfer I; Brecevic L; Saul W; Schenker B; Kirsch M; Trautmann U; Helm G; Gramatzki M; Gebhart E Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Jan; 124(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11165314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a nontumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line that eventually turns tumorigenic: validation of an analytical approach combining karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, chromosome painting, and single-locus fluorescence in situ hybridization. Nielsen KV; Niebuhr E; Ejlertsen B; Holstebroe S; Madsen MW; Briand P; Mouridsen HT; Bolund L Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Sep; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9290951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative genomic hybridisation for the analysis of chromosomal imbalances in solid tumours and haematological malignancies. Zitzelsberger H; Lehmann L; Werner M; Bauchinger M Histochem Cell Biol; 1997; 108(4-5):403-17. PubMed ID: 9387933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of current molecular cytogenetic protocols for the diagnosis of chromosome aberrations in tumor specimens. Lichter P; Fischer K; Joos S; Fink T; Baudis M; Potkul RK; Ohl S; Solinas-Toldo S; Weber R; Stilgenbauer S; Bentz M; Döhner H Cytokines Mol Ther; 1996 Sep; 2(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 9384700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of chromosomal imbalances in children with idiopathic mental retardation by array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH). Schoumans J; Ruivenkamp C; Holmberg E; Kyllerman M; Anderlid BM; Nordenskjöld M J Med Genet; 2005 Sep; 42(9):699-705. PubMed ID: 16141005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative genomic hybridization: a comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis. Nacheva EP; Grace CD; Bittner M; Ledbetter DH; Jenkins RB; Green AR Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1998 Jan; 100(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 9428351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Progresses on the methods of tumor chromosome aberration analysis]. Xue YB; Song X Yi Chuan; 2008 Dec; 30(12):1529-35. PubMed ID: 19073565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]