127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8993818)
1. Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions.
Bell MR; Britson PJ; Chu A; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Schwartz RS
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Jan; 40(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 8993818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages and limitations of two software calipers in quantitative coronary arteriography.
Koning G; Reiber JH; von Land CD; Loois G; van Meurs B
Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 1753156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities.
Reiber JH; van der Zwet PM; Koning G; von Land CD; van Meurs B; Gerbrands JJ; Buis B; van Voorthuisen AE
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Mar; 28(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8439993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries.
Haase J; Di Mario C; Slager CJ; van der Giessen WJ; den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Reiber JH; Verdouw PD; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Angiographic assessment of dimensions of 6F and 7F Mallinckrodt Softouch coronary contrast catheters from digital and cine arteriograms.
Koning G; van der Zwet PM; von Land CD; Reiber JH
Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 1629641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software.
Haase J; van der Linden MM; Di Mario C; van der Giessen WJ; Foley DP; Serruys PW
Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of QCA systems.
Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Meyer J
Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 9306141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital geometric measurements in comparison to cinefilm analysis of coronary artery dimensions.
Haase J; Nugteren SK; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Slager CJ; Di Mario C; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Apr; 28(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 8462076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results.
van der Zwet PM; Reiber JH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jul; 24(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 8006269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.
Wunderlich W; Roehrig B; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Agrawal R; Morguet A; Schultheiss HP; Horstkotte D
Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Aug; 14(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 9934610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Boersma E; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20939040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis: experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings.
Ozaki Y; Keane D; Herrman JP; Foley D; Haase J; den Boer A; di Mario C; Serruys PW
Am Heart J; 1995 Mar; 129(3):471-5. PubMed ID: 7872173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Muramatsu T; Aben JP; Onuma Y; Soekhradj S; Morel MA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2013 Apr; 8(12):1451-60. PubMed ID: 23680960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a new automatic system for biplane quantitative coronary arteriography.
Büchi M; Hess OM; Kirkeeide RL; Suter T; Muser M; Osenberg HP; Niederer P; Anliker M; Gould KL; Krayenbühl HP
Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):93-103. PubMed ID: 2230301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantification.
Tommasini G; Rubartelli P; Piaggio M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Dec; 48(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 10559828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative coronary arteriography: efficient correction of catheter calibrated vessel measurement.
Fischer F; Wunderlich W; Noring J; Linderer T
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():724. PubMed ID: 8591310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat-panel system.
Van Herck PL; Gavit L; Gorissen P; Wuyts FL; Claeys MJ; Bosmans JM; Benali K; Vrints CJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 15390252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration with currently available low-radiopacity catheters for scaling in digital quantitative coronary angiography.
Tadehara F; Imazu M; Kono S; Sano K
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):705-12. PubMed ID: 11753141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
