284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8993997)
1. Age-related changes in child and adolescent event-related potential component morphology, amplitude and latency to standard and target stimuli in an auditory oddball task.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Anderson JW; Coyle SF
Int J Psychophysiol; 1996 Dec; 24(3):223-38. PubMed ID: 8993997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The mismatch negativity and the P3a components of the auditory event-related potentials in autistic low-functioning subjects.
Ferri R; Elia M; Agarwal N; Lanuzza B; Musumeci SA; Pennisi G
Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 114(9):1671-80. PubMed ID: 12948796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of aging on event-related brain potentials and reaction times in an auditory oddball task.
Iragui VJ; Kutas M; Mitchiner MR; Hillyard SA
Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 8416055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Topographic distribution and developmental timecourse of auditory event-related potentials in two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Anderson JW
Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Aug; 42(1):73-94. PubMed ID: 11451480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aging-related changes in processing of non-target and target stimuli during an auditory oddball task.
Amenedo E; Díaz F
Biol Psychol; 1998 Aug; 48(3):235-67. PubMed ID: 9788763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values.
Tomé D; Barbosa F; Nowak K; Marques-Teixeira J
J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2015 Mar; 122(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 24961573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of sex differences on event-related potentials in young adults.
Gölgeli A; Süer C; Ozesmi C; Dolu N; Aşcioğlu M; Sahin O
Int J Neurosci; 1999 Aug; 99(1-4):69-77. PubMed ID: 10495197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory ERPs to non-target stimuli in schizophrenia: relationship to probability, task-demands, and target ERPs.
O'Donnell BF; Hokama H; McCarley RW; Smith RS; Salisbury DF; Mondrow E; Nestor PG; Shenton ME
Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Aug; 17(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 7806466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Long latency auditory evoked potentials in schoolchildren and adolescents with epilepsy].
Zgorzalewicz M
Przegl Lek; 2006; 63 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 17471817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developmental trends of auditory novelty oddball P3 while accounting for N2 in 7- to 25-year-olds.
Mingils SM; Davies PL; Stephens JA; Gavin WJ
Psychophysiology; 2023 Apr; 60(4):e14214. PubMed ID: 36350088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and topography of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs): mismatch and processing negativity in individuals 8-22 years of age.
Oades RD; Dittmann-Balcar A; Zerbin D
Psychophysiology; 1997 Nov; 34(6):677-93. PubMed ID: 9401422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age-changed normative auditory event-related potential value in children in Taiwan.
Tsai ML; Hung KL; Tao-Hsin Tung W; Chiang TR
J Formos Med Assoc; 2012 May; 111(5):245-52. PubMed ID: 22656394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects.
Michalewski HJ; Prasher DK; Starr A
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Jan; 65(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 2416547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Amplitude-time parameters of long-latency components (N1, N2 and P300) of acoustic evoked potential of healthy examinees of young and mature age].
Oknina LB; Kuznetsova OA; Belostostskiĭ AP; Nechaeva NL; Kutakova EV; Masherov EL; Romanov AS
Fiziol Cheloveka; 2011; 37(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 21469355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal variation of P300 in children: age, memory span, and head size.
Polich J; Ladish C; Burns T
Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Oct; 9(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 2276942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. N1 and P2 of frequent and rare event-related potentials show effects and after-effects of the attended target in the oddball-paradigm.
Hirata K; Lehmann D
Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Oct; 9(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 2276947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of immediate and short-term retest on the latencies and amplitudes of the auditory event-related potentials in healthy adults.
Gandelman-Marton R; Theitler J; Klein C; Rabey JM
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jan; 186(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 19854216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes.
Anderer P; Semlitsch HV; Saletu B
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 99(5):458-72. PubMed ID: 9020805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. P300 in young and elderly subjects: auditory frequency and intensity effects.
Vesco KK; Bone RC; Ryan JC; Polich J
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 7688285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
