These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994154)

  • 1. The impact of computer-assisted test interpretation on physician decision making: the case of electrocardiograms.
    Brailer DJ; Kroch E; Pauly MV
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 8994154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of computer-assisted electrocardiographic interpretation on physicians' diagnostic decisions.
    Hillson SD; Connelly DP; Liu Y
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the efficacy of hand-held computer screens for cardiologists' interpretations of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Pettis KS; Savona MR; Leibrandt PN; Maynard C; Lawson WT; Gates KB; Wagner GS
    Am Heart J; 1999 Oct; 138(4 Pt 1):765-70. PubMed ID: 10502225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocardiograms with pacemakers: accuracy of computer reading.
    Guglin ME; Datwani N
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 16919672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of electrocardiogram's interpretation in the emergency department].
    Bouida W; Dridi Z; Nouira S; Gamra H; Ben Frahat M
    Tunis Med; 2004 Apr; 82(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15453031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety of Computer Interpretation of Normal Triage Electrocardiograms.
    Hughes KE; Lewis SM; Katz L; Jones J
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 24(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 27519772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing computerized eye tracking technology for gaining insight into expert interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram: an objective quantitative approach.
    Bond RR; Zhu T; Finlay DD; Drew B; Kligfield PD; Guldenring D; Breen C; Gallagher AG; Daly MJ; Clifford GD
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):895-906. PubMed ID: 25110276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.
    Woolley D; Henck M; Luck J
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training and competency evaluation for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):747-50. PubMed ID: 12729430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making.
    Southern WN; Arnsten JH
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 19470722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Wathen JE; Rewers AB; Yetman AT; Schaffer MS
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated electrocardiogram interpretation programs versus cardiologists' triage decision making based on teletransmitted data in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.
    Clark EN; Sejersten M; Clemmensen P; Macfarlane PW
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Dec; 106(12):1696-702. PubMed ID: 21126612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential benefits of a computer ECG interpretation system for primary care physicians in a community hospital.
    Grauer K; Kravitz L; Ariet M; Curry RW; Nelson WP; Marriott HJ
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 2646852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PEDMEANS: a computer program for the interpretation of pediatric electrocardiograms.
    Rijnbeek PR; Witsenburg M; Szatmari A; Hess J; Kors JA
    J Electrocardiol; 2001; 34 Suppl():85-91. PubMed ID: 11781941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE; Deluca DC; Chien CH; Helfenbein ED; Ariet M
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 22995382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted test interpretation: considerations in patient care.
    Hillson SD; Connelly DP
    J Med Syst; 1992 Oct; 16(5):195-205. PubMed ID: 1289467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.