255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994156)
1. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP
Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three methods for estimating the standard error of the area under the curve in ROC analysis of quantitative data.
Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1278-85. PubMed ID: 12449360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of adjustment methods for stratified two-sample tests in the context of ROC analysis.
Zou KH; Carlsson MO; Yu CR
Biom J; 2012 Mar; 54(2):249-63. PubMed ID: 22378312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
Pan X; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
Mossman D
Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of semiparametric, parametric, and nonparametric ROC analysis for continuous diagnostic tests using a simulation study and acute coronary syndrome data.
Colak E; Mutlu F; Bal C; Oner S; Ozdamar K; Gok B; Cavusoglu Y
Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():698320. PubMed ID: 22844346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of ROC curve with complex survey data.
Yao W; Li Z; Graubard BI
Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1293-303. PubMed ID: 25546290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian semi-parametric ROC analysis.
Erkanli A; Sung M; Costello EJ; Angold A
Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3905-28. PubMed ID: 16416403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
