These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994160)

  • 1. Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements.
    Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1955-63. PubMed ID: 8994160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of the line-pair bar-pattern method in the measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in megavoltage imaging.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18293582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Influence of angle-measurement error on pre-sampled MTF and proposal of an optimal technique of angle measurement].
    Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H; Ohashi K; Kawano M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Feb; 65(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 19246860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the two-dimensional presampled modulation transfer function of digital radiography devices using one-dimensional test objects.
    Wells JR; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6148-60. PubMed ID: 23039654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ; Schueler BA; Ritenour ER
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):913-21. PubMed ID: 12033588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of the presampling modulation transfer function of film digitizers using a curve fitting technique.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(6):962-6. PubMed ID: 2280739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a slit camera for MTF measurements.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Waidelich JM
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2286-94. PubMed ID: 10587209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
    Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
    Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter?
    Moy JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 10659741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the accuracy of MTF measurement at low frequencies based on oversampled edge spread function deconvolution.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Hao T; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 26410662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monotone spline regression for accurate MTF measurement at low frequencies.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Liu H
    Opt Express; 2014 Sep; 22(19):22446-55. PubMed ID: 25321715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lens distortion in optically coupled digital x-ray imaging.
    Liu H; Jiang H; Fajardo LL; Karellas A; Chen WR
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):906-12. PubMed ID: 10841393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a high-density scintillating glass for portal imaging.
    Bissonnette JP; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):401-6. PubMed ID: 8815383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.