197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994163)
1. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical description of the high and low contrast behavior of a scan-rotate geometry for equalization mammography.
Sabol JM; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):887-98. PubMed ID: 8798174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rotary scanning equalization radiography: an efficient geometry for equalization mammography.
Sabol JM; Tam KK; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1994 Oct; 21(10):1523-33. PubMed ID: 7869983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method for practical equalization mammography of the radiographically dense breast.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Radiographics; 1995 Sep; 15(5):1191-202. PubMed ID: 7501859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1505-15. PubMed ID: 8289735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer performance and dose efficiency of mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1517-25. PubMed ID: 8289736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of area x-ray beam equalization on image quality and dose in digital mammography.
Wong J; Xu T; Husain A; Le H; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3539-57. PubMed ID: 15446786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and evaluation of an external filter technique for exposure equalization in mammography.
Keshavmurthy SP; Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Christodoulou E
Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1655-69. PubMed ID: 10501065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1269-77. PubMed ID: 9284251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of compressed breast shapes for the design of equalization filters in x-ray mammography.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Liu B; Guru SV; Morton AR; Keshavmurthy S; Petrick N
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):937-48. PubMed ID: 9650184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
Chen B; Ning R
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A phantom-based evaluation of an exposure equalization technique in mammography.
Skiadopoulos S; Pierrakeas C; Costaridou L; Kalogeropoulou CP; Panayiotakis G
Br J Radiol; 1999 Oct; 72(862):977-85. PubMed ID: 10673949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality and dose in film-screen magnification mammography.
McParland BJ
Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1068-77. PubMed ID: 11271899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann K; Oestmann J; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 9510570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new test phantom with different breast tissue compositions for image quality assessment in conventional and digital mammography.
Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5267-81. PubMed ID: 15656276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.
Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):830-4. PubMed ID: 12033579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion artifact seen on slot-scanning direct digital mammography.
Boyle ER; Pak D; Williams JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 10063863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
