175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994300)
1. A critical appraisal of the value of the mouse cancer bioassay in safety assessment.
Alden CL; Smith PF; Piper CE; Brej L
Toxicol Pathol; 1996; 24(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 8994300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expectations for transgenic rodent cancer bioassay models.
Ashby J
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():177-82. PubMed ID: 11695555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay.
Flammang TJ; Tungeln LS; Kadlubar FF; Fu PP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 9356286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A data-based assessment of alternative strategies for identification of potential human cancer hazards.
Boobis AR; Cohen SM; Doerrer NG; Galloway SM; Haley PJ; Hard GC; Hess FG; Macdonald JS; Thibault S; Wolf DC; Wright J
Toxicol Pathol; 2009 Oct; 37(6):714-32. PubMed ID: 19700658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens.
Ashby J
Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Mar; 15(3):183-202. PubMed ID: 8839204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Tg rasH2 mouse in cancer hazard identification.
Morton D; Alden CL; Roth AJ; Usui T
Toxicol Pathol; 2002; 30(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 11890467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A perspective on current and future uses of alternative models for carcinogenicity testing.
Goodman JI
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():173-6. PubMed ID: 11695554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative models for carcinogenicity testing: weight of evidence evaluations across models.
Cohen SM
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():183-90. PubMed ID: 11695556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of transgenic animals for carcinogenicity testing: considerations and implications for risk assessment.
Gulezian D; Jacobson-Kram D; McCullough CB; Olson H; Recio L; Robinson D; Storer R; Tennant R; Ward JM; Neumann DA
Toxicol Pathol; 2000; 28(3):482-99. PubMed ID: 10862569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of the uses of rats and mice for assessing carcinogenic risk from chemicals in humans.
Ward JM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):18. PubMed ID: 20593921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals in humans from rodent bioassay data.
Goodman G; Wilson R
Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Aug; 94():195-218. PubMed ID: 1954931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toxicokinetic and mechanistic considerations in the interpretation of the rodent bioassay.
MacDonald JS; Lankas GR; Morrissey RE
Toxicol Pathol; 1994; 22(2):124-40. PubMed ID: 7973360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of human cancer risk: challenges for alternative approaches.
Omenn GS
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():5-12. PubMed ID: 11695561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database.
Gold LS; Slone TH
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An enhanced thirteen-week bioassay as an alternative for screening for carcinogenesis factors.
Cohen SM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 20593920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interspecies extrapolation in carcinogenesis: prediction between rats and mice.
Gold LS; Bernstein L; Magaw R; Slone TH
Environ Health Perspect; 1989 May; 81():211-9. PubMed ID: 2759059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The mouse carcinogenicity study is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.
Billington R; Lewis RW; Mehta JM; Dewhurst I
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 40(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 20144135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
