These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994921)

  • 1. Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants.
    Allen MS
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Dec; 74(12):3063-75. PubMed ID: 8994921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants.
    Jung HG; Allen MS
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2774-90. PubMed ID: 8582870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intake limitations, feeding behavior, and rumen function of cows challenged with rumen fill from dietary fiber or inert bulk.
    Dado RG; Allen MS
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Jan; 78(1):118-33. PubMed ID: 7738249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of rumen fiber pool in cattle from dietary, fecal, and animal variables.
    Huhtanen P; Detmann E; Krizsan SJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5345-5357. PubMed ID: 27085408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abdominal chemo- and mechanosensitivity in ruminants and its role in the control of food intake.
    Forbes JM; Barrio JP
    Exp Physiol; 1992 Jan; 77(1):27-50. PubMed ID: 1543591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling ruminant feed intake with protein, chemostatic, and distention feedbacks.
    Fisher DS
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Dec; 74(12):3076-81. PubMed ID: 8994922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling digestive constraints in non-ruminant and ruminant foregut-fermenting mammals.
    Munn AJ; Streich WJ; Hummel J; Clauss M
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol; 2008 Sep; 151(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting dry matter intake using conceptual models for cattle kept under tropical and subtropical conditions1.
    Bateki CA; Dickhoefer U
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3727-3740. PubMed ID: 31269214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Barley processing, forage:concentrate, and forage length effects on chewing and digesta passage in lactating cows.
    Yang WZ; Beauchemin KA; Rode LM
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2709-20. PubMed ID: 11814027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mixing and propulsion of the contents of the reticulo-rumen].
    Baumont R; Deswysen AG
    Reprod Nutr Dev; 1991; 31(4):335-59. PubMed ID: 1660717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships between chewing behavior, digestibility, and digesta passage kinetics in steers fed oat hay at restricted and ad libitum intakes.
    Dias RS; Patino HO; López S; Prates E; Swanson KC; France J
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jun; 89(6):1873-80. PubMed ID: 21297056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Body weight and sex effects on digesta mean retention time in growing Saanen goats.
    Gindri M; Leite RF; Härter CJ; da Silva SP; St-Pierre N; Fernandes MHMDR; Berchielli TT; Teixeira IAMA
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 4(2):txaa028. PubMed ID: 32705026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of prepartum diet, inert rumen bulk, and dietary polyethylene glycol on dry matter intake of lactating dairy cows.
    Johnson TR; Combs DK
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Mar; 74(3):933-44. PubMed ID: 1649204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of varying dietary forage particle size in two concentrate levels on chewing activity, ruminal mat characteristics, and passage in dairy cows.
    Zebeli Q; Tafaj M; Weber I; Dijkstra J; Steingass H; Drochner W
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1929-42. PubMed ID: 17369233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.
    Clauss M; Frey R; Kiefer B; Lechner-Doll M; Loehlein W; Polster C; Rössner GE; Streich WJ
    Oecologia; 2003 Jun; 136(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 12712314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flow paths of plant tissue residues and digesta through gastrointestinal segments in Spanish goats and methodological considerations.
    Walz LS; Ellis WC; White TW; Matis JH; Bateman HG; Williams CC; Fernandez JM; Gentry LR
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):508-20. PubMed ID: 14974550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of feeding grass or red clover silage cut at two maturity stages in dairy cows. 2. Dry matter intake and cell wall digestion kinetics.
    Kuoppala K; Ahvenjärvi S; Rinne M; Vanhatalo A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Nov; 92(11):5634-44. PubMed ID: 19841223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of different segments of the gastrointestinal tract to digestion in growing Saanen goats.
    Leite RF; Krizsan SJ; Figueiredo FO; Carvalho VB; Teixeira IA; Huhtanen P
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1802-14. PubMed ID: 26020201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of feeding level and NDF content of grass-clover silages on chewing activity, fecal particle size and NDF digestibility in dairy heifers.
    Schulze AK; Weisbjerg MR; Nørgaard P
    Animal; 2014 Dec; 8(12):1945-54. PubMed ID: 25209214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digestive constraints on an aquatic carnivore: effects of feeding frequency and prey composition on harbor seals.
    Trumble SJ; Barboza PS; Castellini MA
    J Comp Physiol B; 2003 Aug; 173(6):501-9. PubMed ID: 12856134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.