These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994989)

  • 1. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot.
    Jacobs LK; Shayani V; Sackier JM
    Surg Endosc; 1997 Jan; 11(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 8994989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [AESOP 3000--computer-assisted surgery, personal experience].
    Kasalický MA; Sváb J; Fried M; Melechovský D
    Rozhl Chir; 2002 Jul; 81(7):346-9. PubMed ID: 12197168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control.
    Kondraske GV; Hamilton EC; Scott DJ; Fischer CA; Tesfay ST; Taneja R; Brown RJ; Jones DB
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Nov; 16(11):1523-7. PubMed ID: 12098023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.
    Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New release of the Boonpong laparoscopic camera holder.
    Kornsuthisopon S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1999 Feb; 69(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 10030817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic visual field. Voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot.
    Allaf ME; Jackman SV; Schulam PG; Cadeddu JA; Lee BR; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    Surg Endosc; 1998 Dec; 12(12):1415-8. PubMed ID: 9822469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery.
    Mettler L; Ibrahim M; Jonat W
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct; 13(1O):2748-50. PubMed ID: 9804224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?
    Kraft BM; Jäger C; Kraft K; Leibl BJ; Bittner R
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Aug; 18(8):1216-23. PubMed ID: 15457381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy with the aid of the AESOP 2000 robot.
    Hubens G; Ysebaert D; Vaneerdeweg W; Chapelle T; Eyskens E
    Acta Chir Belg; 1999; 99(3):125-7; discussion 127-9. PubMed ID: 10427347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .
    Kavoussi LR; Moore RG; Adams JB; Partin AW
    J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2134-6. PubMed ID: 7500476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic telescope with alpha port and aesop to view open surgical procedures.
    Russell KM; Broderick TJ; Demaria EJ; Kothari SN; Merrell RC
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2001 Aug; 11(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11569510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
    Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?
    Nio D; Bemelman WA; Balm R; Legemate DA
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Aug; 19(8):1071-6. PubMed ID: 16021377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.
    Partin AW; Adams JB; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 7582231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy.
    LaGrange CA; Clark CJ; Gerber EW; Strup SE
    J Endourol; 2008 Mar; 22(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 18269320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a compact laparoscope manipulator (P-arm).
    Sekimoto M; Nishikawa A; Taniguchi K; Takiguchi S; Miyazaki F; Doki Y; Mori M
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Nov; 23(11):2596-604. PubMed ID: 19357921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotics and telesurgery--an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Rassweiler J; Safi KC; Subotic S; Teber D; Frede T
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2005; 14(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 16754625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our Center].
    Benincà G; Garrone C; Rebecchi F; Giaccone C; Morino M
    Chir Ital; 2003; 55(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 12872566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
    Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.