These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994989)

  • 21. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of surgical performance with standard rigid and flexible-tip laparoscopes.
    Perrone JM; Ames CD; Yan Y; Landman J
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Oct; 19(10):1325-8. PubMed ID: 16228857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of a simple camera navigation trainer.
    Yee KA; Karmali S; Sherman V
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Dec; 209(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 19959045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rate of skill acquisition in the use of a robotic laparoscope holder (FreeHand(®)).
    Sbaih M; Arulampalam TH; Motson RW
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2016 Aug; 25(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 27270102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. First clinical experience in urologic surgery with a novel robotic lightweight laparoscope holder.
    Long JA; Tostain J; Lanchon C; Voros S; Medici M; Descotes JL; Troccaz J; Cinquin P; Rambeaud JJ; Moreau-Gaudry A
    J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22834862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Robotic techniques in laparoscopic surgery].
    Immè A; Caglià P; Gandolfo L; Cavallaro G; Donati M; Amodeo C
    Chir Ital; 2002; 54(1):111-3. PubMed ID: 11942001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?
    Yohannes P; Rotariu P; Pinto P; Smith AD; Lee BR
    Urology; 2002 Jul; 60(1):39-45; discussion 45. PubMed ID: 12100918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study.
    Guru KA; Kuvshinoff BW; Pavlov-Shapiro S; Bienko MB; Aftab MN; Brady WE; Mohler JL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jan; 204(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17189118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.
    Corcione F; Esposito C; Cuccurullo D; Settembre A; Miranda N; Amato F; Pirozzi F; Caiazzo P
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Jan; 19(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 15549629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics.
    Tchartchian G; Dietzel J; Bojahr B; Hackethal A; De Wilde R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 20947079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of fourth arm in da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy: novel technique.
    Esposito MP; Ilbeigi P; Ahmed M; Lanteri V
    Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):649-52. PubMed ID: 16140096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.
    Nio D; Balm R; Maartense S; Guijt M; Bemelman WA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 27(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 14760597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
    Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.
    Ballantyne GH
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is telesurgery a new reality? Our experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous procedures.
    Bove P; Stoianovici D; Micali S; Patriciu A; Grassi N; Jarrett TW; Vespasiani G; Kavoussi LR
    J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 12803985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multipurpose surgical robot as a laparoscope assistant.
    Nelson CA; Zhang X; Shah BC; Goede MR; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1528-32. PubMed ID: 20039068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop.
    Nebot PB; Jain Y; Haylett K; Stone R; McCloy R
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2003 Oct; 13(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 14571171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The voice-controlled robotic assist scope holder AESOP for the endoscopic approach to the sella.
    Nathan CO; Chakradeo V; Malhotra K; D'Agostino H; Patwardhan R
    Skull Base; 2006 Aug; 16(3):123-31. PubMed ID: 17268585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a four-year single-center experience.
    Ruurda JP; Draaisma WA; van Hillegersberg R; Borel Rinkes IH; Gooszen HG; Janssen LW; Simmermacher RK; Broeders IA
    Dig Surg; 2005; 22(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 16192731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.