These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8994989)

  • 41. Human vs robotic organ retraction during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
    Poulose BK; Kutka MF; Mendoza-Sagaon M; Barnes AC; Yang C; Taylor RH; Talamini MA
    Surg Endosc; 1999 May; 13(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 10227942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. PARAMIS parallel robot for laparoscopic surgery.
    Pisla D; Plitea N; Vaida C; Hesselbach J; Raatz A; Vlad L; Graur F; Gyurka B; Gherman B; Suciu M
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2010; 105(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 21141094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robotic surgery and resident training.
    De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery.
    Jaspers JE; Breedveld P; Herder JL; Grimbergen CA
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2004 Jun; 14(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 15471021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Construct, content and face validity of the camera handling trainer (CHT): a new E-BLUS training task for 30° laparoscope navigation skills.
    Veneziano D; Minervini A; Beatty J; Fornara P; Gozen A; Greco F; Langenhuijsen JF; Lunelli L; Overgaauw D; Rassweiler J; Rocco B; Salas RS; Shariat S; Sweet RM; Simone G; Springer C; Tuccio A; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Weibl P; Cozzupoli P
    World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 26245746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    van der Schatte Olivier RH; Van't Hullenaar CD; Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18855053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Designing an active motor skill learning platform with a robot-assisted laparoscopic trainer.
    Lee CS; Yang L; Yang T; Chui CK; Liu J; Huang W; Su Y; Chang SK
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():4534-7. PubMed ID: 22255346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.
    Park JH; Kim SY; Lee CR; Park S; Jeong JS; Kang SW; Jeong JJ; Nam KH; Chung WY; Park CS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2741-5. PubMed ID: 23494081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.
    Rassweiler J; Frede T
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Feb; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17318044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Contribution of laparoscopic training to robotic proficiency.
    Angell J; Gomez MS; Baig MM; Abaza R
    J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):1027-31. PubMed ID: 23527871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparative experimental study evaluating the performance of surgical robots aesop and endosista.
    Yavuz Y; Ystgaard B; Skogvoll E; Mårvik R
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2000 Jun; 10(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10872979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.
    Haveran LA; Novitsky YW; Czerniach DR; Kaban GK; Taylor M; Gallagher-Dorval K; Schmidt R; Kelly JJ; Litwin DE
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jun; 21(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 17436042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Development of Surgical System Using Bellows-Type Foldable Five-Fingered Robot Hand Inserted through a 20-mm Port.
    Nagase Y; Anzai Y; Kato R; Mukai M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():4358-4361. PubMed ID: 36086318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of medical student laparoscopic camera skills and the impact of formal camera training.
    Bennett A; Birch DW; Menzes C; Vizhul A; Karmali S
    Am J Surg; 2011 May; 201(5):655-9. PubMed ID: 21545917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Voice-controlled robotic arm in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bacá I; Schultz C; Grzybowski L; Göetzen V
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):409-12. PubMed ID: 10411970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Do laparoscopic skills transfer to robotic surgery?
    Panait L; Shetty S; Shewokis PA; Sanchez JA
    J Surg Res; 2014 Mar; 187(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 24189181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparative study of 2-D and bichanneled 3-D laparoscopic images: Is there a difference?
    Tung KL; Yang GP; Li MK
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2015 Aug; 8(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 26043363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.