These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8997170)
1. Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Gibbs RW; Moise JF Cognition; 1997 Jan; 62(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 8997170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpreting what speakers say and implicate. Gibbs RW Brain Lang; 1999 Jul; 68(3):466-85. PubMed ID: 10441189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pragmatic choice in conversation. Gibbs RW; Van Orden G Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 22253174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: a response to Gibbs and Moise. Nicolle S; Clark B Cognition; 1999 Jan; 69(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 10193051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions. Schuster S; Degen J Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The neural integration of speaker and message. Van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Tesink CM; Kos M; Hagoort P J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):580-91. PubMed ID: 18052777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speaker knowledge influences the comprehension of pragmatic inferences. Bergen L; Grodner DJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1450-60. PubMed ID: 22545611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children's understanding that utterances emanate from minds: using speaker belief to aid interpretation. Mitchell P; Robinson EJ; Thompson DE Cognition; 1999 Aug; 72(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 10520564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the language given: the neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Bašnáková J; Weber K; Petersson KM; van Berkum J; Hagoort P Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2572-8. PubMed ID: 23645715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Editors' Introduction and Review: Sociolinguistic Variation and Cognitive Science. Chevrot JP; Drager K; Foulkes P Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Oct; 10(4):679-695. PubMed ID: 30294877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge and implicature: modeling language understanding as social cognition. Goodman ND; Stuhlmüller A Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):173-84. PubMed ID: 23335578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Communication and deniability: Moral and epistemic reactions to denials. Bonalumi F; Bumin FB; Scott-Phillips T; Heintz C Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1073213. PubMed ID: 36687811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-year-olds incorporate speaker knowledge into pragmatic inferences. Kampa A; Papafragou A Dev Sci; 2020 May; 23(3):e12920. PubMed ID: 31693776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication. Shintel H; Keysar B J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17352617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony. Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: do cognitive demands override threats to referential success? Lane LW; Ferreira VS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1466-81. PubMed ID: 18980408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. This Better Be Interesting: A Speaker's Decision to Speak Cues Listeners to Expect Informative Content. Rohde H; Hoek J; Keshev M; Franke M Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():118-131. PubMed ID: 36439071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]