These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

921 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8998223)

  • 1. The quality and relationship of referral and reply letters. The effect of introducing a pro forma letter.
    Couper ID; Henbest RJ
    S Afr Med J; 1996 Dec; 86(12):1540-2. PubMed ID: 8998223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communication at the interface: do better referral letters produce better consultant replies?
    Grol R; Rooijackers-Lemmers N; van Kaathoven L; Wollersheim H; Mokkink H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Mar; 53(488):217-9. PubMed ID: 14694699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Referral letters and replies from orthopaedic departments: opportunities missed.
    Jacobs LG; Pringle MA
    BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6750):470-3. PubMed ID: 2207400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of communication between general practitioners and specialists.
    Westerman RF; Hull FM; Bezemer PD; Gort G
    Br J Gen Pract; 1990 Nov; 40(340):445-9. PubMed ID: 2271276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review amongst restorative specialists on the quality of their communication with referring dental practitioners.
    Ricketts DN; Scott BJ; Ali A; Chadwick RG; Murray CA; Radford JR; Saunders WP
    Br Dent J; 2003 Oct; 195(7):389-93; discussion 383. PubMed ID: 14551631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care.
    McConnell D; Butow PN; Tattersall MH
    Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):427-37. PubMed ID: 10408849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communication between general practitioners and consultants: what should their letters contain?
    Newton J; Eccles M; Hutchinson A
    BMJ; 1992 Mar; 304(6830):821-4. PubMed ID: 1392712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of referral reply letters for continuing medical education: a review.
    Gagliardi A
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2002; 22(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 12613057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contents of referral letters to the children emergency unit of a teaching hospital, southwest of Nigeria.
    Orimadegun AE; Akinbami FO; Akinsola AK; Okereke JO
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2008 Mar; 24(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 18347492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communication across the divide. A trial of structured communication between general practice and emergency departments.
    Harris MF; Giles A; O'Toole BI
    Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Feb; 31(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 11917836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The referral letter--a problem of communication.
    Lachman PI; Stander IA
    S Afr Med J; 1991 Jan; 79(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 1989099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the quality of referral letters about patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.
    Jiwa M; Coleman M; McKinley RK
    Postgrad Med J; 2005 Jul; 81(957):467-9. PubMed ID: 15998825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quality assurance survey to improve communication between ENT specialists and general practitioners.
    Thong JF; Mok P; Loke D
    Singapore Med J; 2010 Oct; 51(10):796-9. PubMed ID: 21103815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. General practitioner and hospital letters.
    Salathia K; McIlwaine WJ
    Ulster Med J; 1995 Apr; 64(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 7502402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the quality of outpatient clinic letters using the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL).
    Fox AT; Palmer RD; Crossley JG; Sekaran D; Trewavas ES; Davies HA
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):852-8. PubMed ID: 15271046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Training specialists to write appropriate reply letters to general practitioners about patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms; A cluster-randomized trial.
    Weiland A; Blankenstein AH; Willems MH; Van Saase JL; Van Daele PL; Van der Molen HT; Langbroek GB; Bootsma A; Vriens EM; Oberndorff-Klein Woolthuis A; Vernhout RM; Arends LR
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Oct; 98(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 26206385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study to assess the quality of information in referral letters to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey.
    Izadi M; Gill DS; Naini FB
    Prim Dent Care; 2010 Apr; 17(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 20353655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality and relationship of referral and reply letters.
    Schramm R
    S Afr Med J; 1997 May; 87(5):624. PubMed ID: 9254835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of written reports provided by consultants in restorative dentistry to referring general dental practitioners in the west midlands.
    Saha S; Summerwill AJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Apr; 13(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 16608600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process in Latin America: a cross-sectional study on the use of clinical correspondence in public healthcare networks of six countries.
    Vargas I; Garcia-Subirats I; Mogollón-Pérez AS; Ferreira-de-Medeiros-Mendes M; Eguiguren P; Cisneros AI; Muruaga MC; Bertolotto F; Vázquez ML
    Health Policy Plan; 2018 May; 33(4):494-504. PubMed ID: 29452401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.