86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8999256)
1. [Misdirected quality efforts. Criticism of the survey by the National Board of Health and Welfare on myocardial infarction mortality in Swedish hospitals].
Nilsson G; Holming K; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1996 Dec; 93(50):4624-5, 4627. PubMed ID: 8999256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The National Board of Heath and Welfare and myocardial infarction mortality].
Knutsson P
Lakartidningen; 1996 Dec; 93(49):4525-6. PubMed ID: 8999233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Report from an accused hospital. Mistakes by the National Board of health and Welfare are not to be repeated!].
Ritter B; Stjerna A; Ericsson P
Lakartidningen; 1996 Dec; 93(50):4628. PubMed ID: 8999258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Are mortality figures from the National Board of Health and Welfare acceptable as a quality indicator in myocardial infarction?].
Nilsson G; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1997 May; 94(22):2116-8. PubMed ID: 9213671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Care of myocardial infarction strongly improved 1995-2005. Quality registry, open statements and clear therapeutic goals have payed off].
Stenestrand U; Lindahl B; Wallentin L
Lakartidningen; 2007 May 14-29; 104(20-21):1580-3. PubMed ID: 17564264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Equally good care of myocardial infarction in Sweden today. Geographic differences in mortality are without significance for the individual patient].
Merlo J; Håkansson A; Beckman A; Lindblad U; Lindström M; Gerdtham UG; Råstam L
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jan 3-16; 102(1-2):20-3. PubMed ID: 15707102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dissociation between door-to-balloon time improvement and improvements in other acute myocardial infarction care processes and patient outcomes.
Wang TY; Fonarow GC; Hernandez AF; Liang L; Ellrodt G; Nallamothu BK; Shah BR; Cannon CP; Peterson ED
Arch Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 169(15):1411-9. PubMed ID: 19667305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ["Open comparisons" no reliable measures of the quality of care in myocardial infarction. The epidemiological registry is not sufficient for county comparisons].
Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
Lakartidningen; 2009 Aug 26-Sep 1; 106(35):2121-4. PubMed ID: 19827376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The use of a check list for quality assurance of the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit].
Meinardi F; Steffenino G; Ugliengo G; Vado A; Conte E; Deorsola A; Menardi E; Giordano P; Rizzotti M; Uslenghi E
G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1375-83. PubMed ID: 9162667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved adherence to Swedish national guidelines for acute myocardial infarction: the Quality Improvement in Coronary Care (QUICC) study.
Carlhed R; Bojestig M; Wallentin L; Lindström G; Peterson A; Aberg C; Lindahl B;
Am Heart J; 2006 Dec; 152(6):1175-81. PubMed ID: 17161072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Improve the quality of quality work].
Nilsson G; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1997 Aug; 94(32-33):2715. PubMed ID: 9289568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [What is myocardial infarct? Quality assurance based on mortality figures is misleading if the diagnostic criteria are varying].
Nilsson G; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1994 Jan; 91(1-2):28-9. PubMed ID: 8289549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Heart infarction registry or the art of medicine--can they be united?].
Lindström K; Järhult B
Lakartidningen; 2007 Aug 8-21; 104(32-33):2258-9; discussion 2259-62. PubMed ID: 17822206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparability of quality-of-care indicators for emergency coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction regardless of on-site cardiac surgery (report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction).
Sanborn TA; Jacobs AK; Frederick PD; Every NR; French WJ;
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 93(11):1335-9, A5. PubMed ID: 15165910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex differences in survival after myocardial infarction in Sweden; data from the Swedish National Acute Myocardial Infarction Register.
Rosengren A; Spetz CL; Köster M; Hammar N; Alfredsson L; Rosén M
Eur Heart J; 2001 Feb; 22(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 11161950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional systems of care to optimize timeliness of reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Mayo Clinic STEMI Protocol.
Ting HH; Rihal CS; Gersh BJ; Haro LH; Bjerke CM; Lennon RJ; Lim CC; Bresnahan JF; Jaffe AS; Holmes DR; Bell MR
Circulation; 2007 Aug; 116(7):729-36. PubMed ID: 17673456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Geographical differences in mortality after myocardial infarction? Coincidence claims many victims--small hospitals suffer most of all!].
Merlo J; Håkansson A; Beckman A; Lindström M; Lindblad U; Gerdtham UG; Råstam L
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jan 17-23; 102(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 15712743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of myocardial infarction mortality: open comparisons give better picture than Riks-HIA].
Björck S; Torgerson JS
Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 7-13; 106(41):2622-3. PubMed ID: 19927928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Continuous quality assurance at an emergency department. Marker diagnoses resulted in a useful method].
Asberg KH
Lakartidningen; 1994 Aug; 91(35):3074-7. PubMed ID: 7983945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation in combination with acute myocardial infarction influences long-term outcome: a prospective cohort study from the Register of Information and Knowledge About Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions (RIKS-HIA).
Stenestrand U; Lindbäck J; Wallentin L;
Circulation; 2005 Nov; 112(21):3225-31. PubMed ID: 16301355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
