These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9001935)

  • 1. Trabecular bone adaptation to variations in porous-coated implant topology.
    Guldberg RE; Richards M; Caldwell NJ; Kuelske CL; Goldstein SA
    J Biomech; 1997 Feb; 30(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 9001935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines.
    Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A paradigm for the development and evaluation of novel implant topologies for bone fixation: in vivo evaluation.
    Long JP; Hollister SJ; Goldstein SA
    J Biomech; 2012 Oct; 45(15):2651-7. PubMed ID: 22951278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional printing and porous metallic surfaces: a new orthopedic application.
    Melican MC; Zimmerman MC; Dhillon MS; Ponnambalam AR; Curodeau A; Parsons JR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 May; 55(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 11255171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants.
    Dalton JE; Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 7822360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical stimulation of tissue repair in the hydraulic bone chamber.
    Guldberg RE; Caldwell NJ; Guo XE; Goulet RW; Hollister SJ; Goldstein SA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1295-302. PubMed ID: 9258761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions.
    Jasty M; Bragdon C; Burke D; O'Connor D; Lowenstein J; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 May; 79(5):707-14. PubMed ID: 9160943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
    Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of therapeutic doses of irradiation on experimental bone graft incorporation over a porous-coated segmental defect endoprosthesis.
    Chin HC; Frassica FJ; Markel MD; Frassica DA; Sim FH; Chao EY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Apr; (289):254-66. PubMed ID: 8472425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trabecular bone remodeling: an experimental model.
    Goldstein SA; Matthews LS; Kuhn JL; Hollister SJ
    J Biomech; 1991; 24 Suppl 1():135-50. PubMed ID: 1791174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris.
    Bobyn JD; Jacobs JJ; Tanzer M; Urban RM; Aribindi R; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):21-39. PubMed ID: 7634577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone.
    Wong M; Eulenberger J; Schenk R; Hunziker E
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1567-75. PubMed ID: 8600147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: A unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties.
    Bobbert FSL; Lietaert K; Eftekhari AA; Pouran B; Ahmadi SM; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Apr; 53():572-584. PubMed ID: 28213101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V implants with bone-inspired porosity and micro/nanoscale surface roughness in the rabbit femur.
    Cohen DJ; Cheng A; Sahingur K; Clohessy RM; Hopkins LB; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
    Biomed Mater; 2017 Apr; 12(2):025021. PubMed ID: 28452335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simplified boundary conditions alter cortical-trabecular load sharing at the distal radius; A multiscale finite element analysis.
    Johnson JE; Troy KL
    J Biomech; 2018 Jan; 66():180-185. PubMed ID: 29137724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Significance of peak value and duration of the interfacial shear load in evaluation of the bone-implant interface.
    Chang YS; Kobayashi M; Li ZL; Oka M; Nakamura T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2003 Oct; 18(8):773-9. PubMed ID: 12957565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Bony ongrowth on the surface of HA-coated femoral implants: an x-ray analysis].
    Zweymüller KA
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2012 Feb; 150(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22009584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion.
    Bragdon CR; Burke D; Lowenstein JD; O'Connor DO; Ramamurti B; Jasty M; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Dec; 11(8):945-51. PubMed ID: 8986573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone ingrowth to implant surfaces in an inflammatory arthritis model.
    An YH; Friedman RJ; Jiang M; LaBreck JC; Draughn RA; Butehorn HF; Bauer TW
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Sep; 16(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 9820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.