These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9002089)

  • 1. Infrared pupillometry in presbyopes fitted with soft contact lenses.
    Chateau N; De Brabander J; Bouchard F; Molenaar H
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Dec; 73(12):733-41. PubMed ID: 9002089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Age, Refractive Status, and Luminance on Pupil Size.
    Guillon M; Dumbleton K; Theodoratos P; Gobbe M; Wooley CB; Moody K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Sep; 93(9):1093-100. PubMed ID: 27232893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do small-aperture presbyopic corrections influence the visual field?
    Atchison DA; Blazaki S; Suheimat M; Plainis S; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jan; 36(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 26769327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pupil diameter, working distance and illumination during habitual tasks. Implications for simultaneous vision contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Cardona G; López S
    J Optom; 2016; 9(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26481439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Spherical Aberration Terms on Multifocal Contact Lens Performance.
    Fedtke C; Sha J; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Bakaraju RC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 27879499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized Crossover Trial of Silicone Hydrogel Presbyopic Contact Lenses.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 93(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 26704141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ocular Straylight with Different Multifocal Contact Lenses.
    Łabuz G; López-Gil N; van den Berg TJ; Vargas-Martín F
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Apr; 94(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 28009794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.
    Rueff EM; Bailey MD
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 28343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Efficacy of Pinhole Soft Contact Lenses for the Correction of Presbyopia.
    Park SY; Choi YJ; Jung JW; Choi M; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2019; 34(2):106-114. PubMed ID: 30865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interocular differences in visual latency induced by reduced-aperture monovision.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Radhakrishnan H; Pallikaris IG; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 23278194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.