These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Grinding precision and accuracy of the fit of Cerec-2 CAD/CIM inlays]. Schug J; Pfeiffer J; Sener B; Mörmann WH Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(7):913-9. PubMed ID: 7631183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays. Fasbinder DJ; Dennison JB; Heys DR; Lampe K J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1714-23. PubMed ID: 16383055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Marginal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays]. Chen Y; Zhao Y; Wang H Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 15(4):317-8, 327. PubMed ID: 11479977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays. Kawai K; Hayashi M; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Oct; 126(10):1414-9. PubMed ID: 7594014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype. Reich S; Gozdowski S; Trentzsch L; Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 19051857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Otto T; De Nisco S Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Nakamura T; Dei N; Kojima T; Wakabayashi K Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 12854786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Sjögren G Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Feb; 53(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 7740927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Otto T; Schneider D Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two ceramic materials compared for the production of CEREC inlays. Shearer AC; Heymann HO; Wilson NH J Dent; 1993 Oct; 21(5):302-4. PubMed ID: 8227693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Folwaczny M; Hickel R J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 15536855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Accuracy of optical scanning methods of the Cerec 3D system in the process of making ceramic inlays]. Trifković B; Todorović A; Lazić V; Draganjac M; Mirković N; Jokić B Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Oct; 67(10):812-8. PubMed ID: 21066873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The new creativity in ceramic restorations: dental CAD-CIM. Mörmann WH; Bindl A Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):821-8. PubMed ID: 9452675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial denture frameworks in vitro. Bindl A; Mörmann WH Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Dec; 27(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 18092451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces. Hembree JH Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 7568725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]