These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The changing face of peer review at the National Institutes of Health. Leppert PC Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 14967360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why clinical research grant applications fare poorly in review and how to recover. Cuca JM; McLoughlin WJ Cancer Invest; 1987; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3580946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NIH gathers information on peer review. Physiologist; 2007 Apr; 50(2):68. PubMed ID: 17477020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Glimpses of the National Institutes of Health. II: Review systems and evaluation. Smith R Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Mar; 296(6623):691-5. PubMed ID: 3128373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The 1988 Harry G. Armstrong lecture: contributions of NIH to aerospace medicine. Wyngaarden JB Aviat Space Environ Med; 1989 Mar; 60(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 2653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review: the continual need for reassessment. Levy JA Cancer Invest; 1984; 2(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 6467070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Be an NIH Reviewer: Contribute to Multidisciplinary Research. Jenkins ML West J Nurs Res; 2018 Mar; 40(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 28714349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. appointment. Zerhouni confirmed as NIH director. Kaiser J Science; 2002 May; 296(5570):997-9. PubMed ID: 12004090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. National institute of kidney and urologic diseases. Gillenwater JY J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 1):491. PubMed ID: 8015099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A proposal for per capita distribution of research funds with administrative flexibility. Hirsch HR Fed Proc; 1984 Apr; 43(5):7a-8a. PubMed ID: 6705928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]