These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9002547)

  • 1. Peer review at NIH in the 21st Century.
    Baldwin W; McCardle P
    FASEB J; 1996 Dec; 10(14):1563-8. PubMed ID: 9002547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The changing face of peer review at the National Institutes of Health.
    Leppert PC
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 14967360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why clinical research grant applications fare poorly in review and how to recover.
    Cuca JM; McLoughlin WJ
    Cancer Invest; 1987; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3580946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NIH gathers information on peer review.
    Physiologist; 2007 Apr; 50(2):68. PubMed ID: 17477020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Point: Statistical analysis in NIH peer review--identifying innovation.
    Kaplan D
    FASEB J; 2007 Feb; 21(2):305-8. PubMed ID: 17267383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH peer-review revision panel is named.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6669):725. PubMed ID: 9486632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glimpses of the National Institutes of Health. II: Review systems and evaluation.
    Smith R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Mar; 296(6623):691-5. PubMed ID: 3128373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: a crisis in confidence.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1986 Oct; 34(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 3780138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 1988 Harry G. Armstrong lecture: contributions of NIH to aerospace medicine.
    Wyngaarden JB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1989 Mar; 60(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 2653303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review: the continual need for reassessment.
    Levy JA
    Cancer Invest; 1984; 2(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 6467070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Be an NIH Reviewer: Contribute to Multidisciplinary Research.
    Jenkins ML
    West J Nurs Res; 2018 Mar; 40(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 28714349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U.S. appointment. Zerhouni confirmed as NIH director.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2002 May; 296(5570):997-9. PubMed ID: 12004090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review.
    Felton G; Swanson EA
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 7844277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National institute of kidney and urologic diseases.
    Gillenwater JY
    J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 1):491. PubMed ID: 8015099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A proposal for per capita distribution of research funds with administrative flexibility.
    Hirsch HR
    Fed Proc; 1984 Apr; 43(5):7a-8a. PubMed ID: 6705928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cautious welcome to NIH peer review reforms.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):269. PubMed ID: 8183356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH nominee draws scrutiny.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2009 Jul; 460(7253):310-1. PubMed ID: 19606109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overhaul of peer review at NIH.
    Fusaro RM
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1649. PubMed ID: 10560706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise.
    Wyngaarden JB
    P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.