106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9002789)
1. 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):150-2. PubMed ID: 9002789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
Barnes DM; Blank LW; Thompson VP; Holston AM; Gingell JC
Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations.
Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Cordeiro HJ; Amore R; Lewgoy HR
Am J Dent; 2007 Apr; 20(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17542208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.
de Souza FB; Guimarães RP; Silva CH
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15709496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions.
Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):309-11. PubMed ID: 12537340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro.
Göhring TN; Schönenberger KA; Lutz F
Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 14579884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results.
Rasmusson CG; Lundin SA
Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8614898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities.
Ferracane JL; Mitchem JC
Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 14579877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
