397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9002806)
1. Pain elicited during intraoral infiltration with buffered lidocaine.
Primosch RE; Robinson L
Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9002806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine.
Burns CA; Ferris G; Feng C; Cooper JZ; Brown MD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 54(1):128-31. PubMed ID: 16384767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations.
Hobeich P; Simon S; Schneiderman E; He J
J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):597-9. PubMed ID: 23611375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation.
Meechan JG; Day PF
Anesth Prog; 2002; 49(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 15384291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of buffered local anesthetic.
Bowles WH; Frysh H; Emmons R
Gen Dent; 1995; 43(2):182-4; quiz 186. PubMed ID: 7590153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Neutralization of lidocaine-adrenaline. A simple method for less painful application of local anesthesia].
Momsen OH; Roman CM; Mohammed BA; Andersen G
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Aug; 162(33):4391-4. PubMed ID: 10962963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local infiltration of epinephrine-containing lidocaine with bicarbonate reduces superficial bleeding and pain during labor epidural catheter insertion: a randomized trial.
Carvalho B; Fuller A; Brummel C; Cohen SE
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Apr; 16(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 17276670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia.
Welch MN; Czyz CN; Kalwerisky K; Holck DE; Mihora LD
Ophthalmology; 2012 Oct; 119(10):2048-52. PubMed ID: 22771049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison between buffered 1% lidocaine-epinephrine and skin cooling in reducing the pain of local anesthetic infiltration.
Al Shahwan MA
Dermatol Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1654-9. PubMed ID: 22849545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of buffered lidocaine in bone marrow biopsies: a randomized, controlled trial.
Ruegg TA; Curran CR; Lamb T
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Jan; 36(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 19136338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local anesthesia in the palate: a comparison of techniques and solutions.
Meechan JG; Day PF; McMillan AS
Anesth Prog; 2000; 47(4):139-42. PubMed ID: 11432180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Buffered lidocaine for incision and drainage: a prospective, randomized double-blind study.
Balasco M; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1329-34. PubMed ID: 24139250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Buffered Versus Non-Buffered Lidocaine With Epinephrine for Mandibular Nerve Block: Clinical Outcomes.
Phero JA; Nelson B; Davis B; Dunlop N; Phillips C; Reside G; Tikunov AP; White RP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 75(4):688-693. PubMed ID: 27815105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of prilocaine for the reduction of pain associated with transmucosal anesthetic administration.
Kramp LF; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP
Anesth Prog; 1999; 46(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10853565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.
Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 16776407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mason R; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19720211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtually painless local anesthesia: diluted lidocaine proves to be superior to buffered lidocaine for subcutaneous infiltration.
Zaiac M; Aguilera SB; Zaulyanov-Scanlan L; Caperton C; Chimento S
J Drugs Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 11(10):e39-42. PubMed ID: 23134997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
