184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9002824)
1. Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures.
Matarasso S; Quaremba G; Coraggio F; Vaia E; Cafiero C; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Mar; 7(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 9002824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of hygiene instrumentation on titanium abutments: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Homiak AW; Cook PA; DeBoer J
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 1324308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of various hygiene procedures on the surface characteristics of titanium abutments.
Meschenmoser A; d'Hoedt B; Meyle J; Elssner G; Korn D; Hämmerle H; Schulte W
J Periodontol; 1996 Mar; 67(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 8708954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant surface roughness alterations induced by different prophylactic procedures: an in vitro study.
Cafiero C; Aglietta M; Iorio-Siciliano V; Salvi GE; Blasi A; Matarasso S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e16-e20. PubMed ID: 27283010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces.
Schmage P; Thielemann J; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Pfeiffer P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 22442769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces.
Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A
J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of titanium implant abutment surface irregularities on plaque accumulation in vivo.
McCollum J; O'Neal RB; Brennan WA; Van Dyke TE; Horner JA
J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):802-5. PubMed ID: 1403586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments on cell attachment.
Dmytryk JJ; Fox SC; Moriarty JD
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):491-6. PubMed ID: 2202808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis].
Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L
Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of roughness of titanium surfaces treated by different hygiene instruments.
Unursaikhan O; Lee JS; Cha JK; Park JC; Jung UW; Kim CS; Cho KS; Choi SH
J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2012 Jun; 42(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 22803010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces.
Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments.
Rapley JW; Swan RH; Hallmon WW; Mills MP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study.
Happe A; Röling N; Schäfer A; Rothamel D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 25749083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different cleaning methods on the surface and temperature of failed titanium implants: an in vitro study.
Hakki SS; Tatar G; Dundar N; Demiralp B
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):563-571. PubMed ID: 28160204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study.
Rühling A; Kocher T; Kreusch J; Plagmann HC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8038341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
