These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9002870)
1. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations. Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types. Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers. Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations. Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations. Bonilla E; White SN Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of dentin bonding and ferrule preparation on the fracture strength of crowned teeth restored with dowels and amalgam cores. Aykent F; Kalkan M; Yucel MT; Ozyesil AG J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 95(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 16616127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post. Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Boyer DB; Roth L Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth. Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique. Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 11551017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure. Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations. Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]