These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9002890)

  • 1. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.
    Misch CE
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1995; 7(9):15-8. PubMed ID: 9002890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What's your choice: cement- or screw-retained implant restorations?
    Strong SM
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18254555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single Posterior Implant Crown Fabrication. Cement-On Versus Screw-Retained Crowns.
    Kosinski T
    Dent Today; 2015 Aug; 34(8):74, 76-9. PubMed ID: 26390763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrievable cemented implant restorations.
    Chee WW; Torbati A; Albouy JP
    J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun; 7(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 9743667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
    Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.
    Shadid R; Sadaqa N
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 21091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior single-tooth implant restorations.
    Lewis S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Feb; 15(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 7591521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for restoring facially inclined implants with a screw-retained restoration.
    Takanashi K; Lee JM; Sedler A; Aalam AK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 23566609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of an occlusal screw-access hole on the fracture resistance of permanently cemented implant crowns: a laboratory study.
    Shadid RM; Abu-Naba'a L; Al-Omari WM; Asfar KR; El Masoud BM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant angulation and position and screw or cement retention: clinical guidelines.
    Dario LJ
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 9081575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis.
    Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Traini T; Di lorio D; Caputi S
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE; Martin W; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing abutments for cement retained implant supported restorations.
    Chee W; Jivraj S
    Br Dent J; 2006 Nov; 201(9):559-63. PubMed ID: 17099660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screw-access marking: a technique to simplify retrieval of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    Schoenbaum TR; Chang YY; Klokkevold PR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Mar; 34(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 23931268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
    Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative method for retention and removal of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    Valbao FP; Perez EG; Breda M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):181-3. PubMed ID: 11514807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained multiunit implant restoration.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 17069169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.