113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9003436)
1. Role of the amino terminal domain in GroES oligomerization.
Llorca O; Schneider K; Carrascosa JL; Méndez E; Valpuesta JM
Biochim Biophys Acta; 1997 Jan; 1337(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9003436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of the structure of GroES and its interaction with GroEL.
Valencia A; Hubbard TJ; Muga A; Bañuelos S; Llorca O; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
Proteins; 1995 Jul; 22(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 7479694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Productive folding of a tethered protein in the chaperonin GroEL-GroES cage.
Motojima F; Yoshida M
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 26325470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biochemical characterization of symmetric GroEL-GroES complexes. Evidence for a role in protein folding.
Llorca O; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
J Biol Chem; 1996 Jan; 271(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 8550627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding.
Motojima F; Makio T; Aoki K; Makino Y; Kuwajima K; Yoshida M
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2000 Jan; 267(3):842-9. PubMed ID: 10673379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Symmetric GroEL-GroES complexes can contain substrate simultaneously in both GroEL rings.
Llorca O; Marco S; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
FEBS Lett; 1997 Mar; 405(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 9089290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversible oligomerization and denaturation of the chaperonin GroES.
Seale JW; Gorovits BM; Ybarra J; Horowitz PM
Biochemistry; 1996 Apr; 35(13):4079-83. PubMed ID: 8672442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chaperonin-assisted protein folding of the enzyme rhodanese by GroEL/GroES.
Horowitz PM
Methods Mol Biol; 1995; 40():361-8. PubMed ID: 7633531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis.
Hayer-Hartl MK; Weber F; Hartl FU
EMBO J; 1996 Nov; 15(22):6111-21. PubMed ID: 8947033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The C-terminal sequence of the chaperonin GroES is required for oligomerization.
Seale JW; Horowitz PM
J Biol Chem; 1995 Dec; 270(51):30268-70. PubMed ID: 8530444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preformed GroES oligomers are not required as functional cochaperonins.
Seale JW; Chirgwin JM; Demeler B; Horowitz PM
J Protein Chem; 1997 Oct; 16(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 9330224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes.
Farr GW; Fenton WA; Chaudhuri TK; Clare DK; Saibil HR; Horwich AL
EMBO J; 2003 Jul; 22(13):3220-30. PubMed ID: 12839985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GroEL walks the fine line: the subtle balance of substrate and co-chaperonin binding by GroEL. A combinatorial investigation by design, selection and screening.
Kawe M; Plückthun A
J Mol Biol; 2006 Mar; 357(2):411-26. PubMed ID: 16427651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL-GroES: function, structure and energetics.
Chaudhry C; Farr GW; Todd MJ; Rye HS; Brunger AT; Adams PD; Horwich AL; Sigler PB
EMBO J; 2003 Oct; 22(19):4877-87. PubMed ID: 14517228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of chaperonins in protein folding. A new model of the GroEL/GroES complex architecture.
Basharov MA
Biochemistry (Mosc); 1997 Apr; 62(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 9312423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Truncated GroEL monomer has the ability to promote folding of rhodanese without GroES and ATP.
Makino Y; Taguchi H; Yoshida M
FEBS Lett; 1993 Dec; 336(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 7903258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding: Relative Population of Asymmetric and Symmetric GroEL:GroES Complexes.
Haldar S; Gupta AJ; Yan X; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
J Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 427(12):2244-55. PubMed ID: 25912285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone: a sequence correlation approach.
Chaudhuri TK; Gupta P
Cell Stress Chaperones; 2005; 10(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 15832945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Creating the Functional Single-Ring GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Systems via Modulating GroEL-GroES Interaction.
Illingworth M; Ellis H; Chen L
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9710. PubMed ID: 28852160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
