327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9004361)
1. Proton dosimetry intercomparison.
Vatnitsky S; Siebers J; Miller D; Moyers M; Schaefer M; Jones D; Vynckier S; Hayakawa Y; Delacroix S; Isacsson U; Medin J; Kacperek A; Lomax A; Coray A; Kluge H; Heese J; Verhey L; Daftari I; Gall K; Lam G; Beck T; Hartmann G
Radiother Oncol; 1996 Nov; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9004361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proton beam dosimetry for radiosurgery: implementation of the ICRU Report 59 at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory.
Newhauser WD; Myers KD; Rosenthal SJ; Smith AR
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 47(8):1369-89. PubMed ID: 12030561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
Swanpalmer J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deduction of the air w value in a therapeutic proton beam.
Siebers JV; Vatnitsky SM; Miller DW; Moyers MF
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1339-56. PubMed ID: 7480117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry of clinical neutron and proton beams: an overview of recommendations.
Vynckier S; ;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):565-72. PubMed ID: 15353710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
