92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9004722)
21. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Status of screening tests for cervical cancer and its precancerous lesion].
Zhao FH; Rong SD; Qiao YL
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 23(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 12901114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evidence-based medicine--in real time. Comparing methods of cervical Ca screening.
Genova NJ
JAAPA; 2000 Jan; 13(1):55-6, 59-60, 63. PubMed ID: 11503224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Colposcopy, cervical screening, and HPV. Preface.
Waxman AG
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):xv-xvi. PubMed ID: 19061813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
Cenci M; Nagar C; Vecchione A
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Whatever happened to cervical cytology automation?
Tucker J; Stenkvist B
Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Jul; 2(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 2275872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. How to take cervical smears.
Johnson W
Community Nurse; 1999 Jun; 5(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 10513548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Disappointing effectiveness of population screening for cervical cancer].
Giard RW; Coebergh JW; Wijnen JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Feb; 141(7):317-21. PubMed ID: 9132604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cervical screening program for Sri Lanka--can we afford it?
Sirisena J
Ceylon Med J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10643099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Pap smear screening for cervical cancer in Singapore: issues to consider.
Tay EH
Singapore Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(6):244-6. PubMed ID: 15181515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Sensitivity of partial rescreening in cervical cytology.
Coleman DV; Baker R
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(5):1631-3. PubMed ID: 9305398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Cervix cancer screening can be cost-effective. Combination of vaginal smears and the HPV test should be even more beneficial].
Bistoletti P; Ellström A; Dillner J; Sennfält K; Sparén P; Strander B
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jun 13-26; 102(24-25):1874-6, 1878-9. PubMed ID: 16044766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Results of AutoPap system-assisted and manual cytologic screening. A comparison.
Wertlake P
J Reprod Med; 1999 Jan; 44(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9987733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lifelong protection from cervical cancer.
Cadman L
Community Nurse; 1998 Jan; 3(12):12-3. PubMed ID: 9505588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Costs and problems in cervix cancer screening are considerably underestimated].
Bistoletti P
Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3506-8. PubMed ID: 11037597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing costs and benefits of PAPNET.
Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):1109-11. PubMed ID: 8842185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Location-guided screening of liquid-based cervical cytology specimens: a potential improvement in accuracy and productivity is demonstrated in a preclinical feasibility trial.
Wilbur DC; Parker EM; Foti JA
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Sep; 118(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 12219782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
