These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9005547)

  • 1. Selling science: at what price?
    Lawler A
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5298):296-7. PubMed ID: 9005547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 2002 spending. First Bush budget may put science on diet.
    Malakoff D; Mervis J
    Science; 2001 Feb; 291(5508):1463-4. PubMed ID: 11234058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A budget out of balance.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5512):2275. PubMed ID: 11269281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hitting the President's target is mixed blessing for agencies.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1994 Oct; 266(5183):211. PubMed ID: 7939651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Policy. Science lobbyists aim for better balanced budget.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5510):1882-4. PubMed ID: 11245182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing the science budget.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2000 Feb; 287(5455):952-5. PubMed ID: 10691566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinton's farewell gift to US science agencies.
    Macilwain C; Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6770):585. PubMed ID: 10688168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proposed research budget a starting point.
    Rogers PG
    Science; 2001 Apr; 292(5516):437. PubMed ID: 11330291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 2001 U.S. budget. Record year for science, but can it be repeated?
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):33. PubMed ID: 11192000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science catches Clinton's eye.
    Lawler A
    Science; 1998 Feb; 279(5352):794-7. PubMed ID: 9480546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
    Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):279. PubMed ID: 11099007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
    Lawler A; Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinton holds the line on R&D.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1995 Feb; 267(5199):780-2. PubMed ID: 7846519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science budget: growth amid red ink.
    Norman C
    Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4994):616-8. PubMed ID: 1992512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large research facilities to lose out in science spending spree?
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6793):221-2. PubMed ID: 10917492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. R&D budget: growth in hard times.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5148):744-6. PubMed ID: 8303284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impasse puts NIH grants on hold.
    Marshall E; Mervis J
    Science; 1996 Jan; 271(5245):22. PubMed ID: 8539589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH, related agencies face flat budget future.
    Finkelstein JB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376-7. PubMed ID: 16537827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 1997 budget confirms US science faces a period of flat funding.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.