These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9005547)

  • 21. 2001 budget. Clinton seeks 'major lift' in U.S. research programs.
    Lawler A
    Science; 2000 Jan; 287(5453):558-9. PubMed ID: 10691526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NSF does well, NIH does not in Clinton's 1994 budget.
    Mervis J
    Nature; 1993 Apr; 362(6419):382-3. PubMed ID: 8464460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. U.S. science budget. For all but NIH, the devil is indeed in the details.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Apr; 292(5515):182-5. PubMed ID: 11305291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SOS (again) at the Department of Energy.
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6793):219. PubMed ID: 10917491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. U.S. science policy. Meet two new science spending cardinals in Congress.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6221):466-7. PubMed ID: 25635067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 2003 budget. War effort shapes U.S. budget, with some program casualties.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Feb; 295(5557):952-4. PubMed ID: 11834796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Science in the national interest.
    Abelson PH
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5149):899. PubMed ID: 8310282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. US midterm elections offer little hope for science.
    Morello L
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7523):412-3. PubMed ID: 25341766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research, innovation and politics.
    Hart DM; Branscomb LM
    Nature; 2000 Oct; 407(6804):561-2. PubMed ID: 11034186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The myths of science.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1267-8. PubMed ID: 1971333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 2004 budget request. Protecting the homeland sets tone for 2004 budget.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5608):806-8. PubMed ID: 12574594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Glocal" science advocacy.
    Leshner AI
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):877. PubMed ID: 18276853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomedical research shines in Clinton budget bonanza.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):521-2. PubMed ID: 9468122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Show us the money.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5805):1515. PubMed ID: 17158292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reinvesting in US biomedical research--the time is now.
    Yang VW
    Gastroenterology; 2009 Oct; 137(4):1202-3. PubMed ID: 19732858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Science gets little love in Trump spending plan.
    Science News Staff
    Science; 2017 May; 356(6340):795. PubMed ID: 28546167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. U.S. research forum fails to find a common front.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5148):752. PubMed ID: 8303289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Washington Report. Health and science policies--a look ahead.
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Dec; 299(26):1475-6. PubMed ID: 714144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An open letter to the administration on indirect costs.
    Pings CJ
    Acad Med; 1994 May; 69(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 8166915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.