These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9006315)

  • 1. Measurement error correction for logistic regression models with an "alloyed gold standard".
    Spiegelman D; Schneeweiss S; McDermott A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Jan; 145(2):184-96. PubMed ID: 9006315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting for exposure misclassification using an alloyed gold standard.
    Brenner H
    Epidemiology; 1996 Jul; 7(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 8793367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regression calibration with heteroscedastic error variance.
    Spiegelman D; Logan R; Grove D
    Int J Biostat; 2011; 7(1):4. PubMed ID: 22848187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for random within-person measurement error.
    Rosner B; Spiegelman D; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Dec; 136(11):1400-13. PubMed ID: 1488967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology.
    Spiegelman D; McDermott A; Rosner B
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr; 65(4 Suppl):1179S-1186S. PubMed ID: 9094918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error.
    Rosner B; Willett WC; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 1989 Sep; 8(9):1051-69; discussion 1071-3. PubMed ID: 2799131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation studies using an alloyed gold standard.
    Wacholder S; Armstrong B; Hartge P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Jun; 137(11):1251-8. PubMed ID: 8322765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using repeated measures to correct correlated measurement errors through orthogonal decomposition.
    Yu C; Zhang S; Friedenreich C; Matthews CE
    Commun Stat Theory Methods; 2017; 46(23):11604-11611. PubMed ID: 30906107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement error correction for nutritional exposures with correlated measurement error: use of the method of triads in a longitudinal setting.
    Rosner B; Michels KB; Chen YH; Day NE
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3466-89. PubMed ID: 18416440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error.
    Rosner B; Spiegelman D; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Oct; 132(4):734-45. PubMed ID: 2403114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of regression calibration to non-perfect validation data with application to the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.
    Buonaccorsi JP; Dalen I; Laake P; Hjartåker A; Engeset D; Thoresen M
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1389-403. PubMed ID: 25627982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists.
    Spiegelman D; Valanis B
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Mar; 88(3):406-12. PubMed ID: 9518972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
    Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Segmented regression with errors in predictors: semi-parametric and parametric methods.
    Küchenhoff H; Carroll RJ
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):169-88. PubMed ID: 9004390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four calibration studies.
    Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Freedman LS; Li L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 150(6):642-51. PubMed ID: 10490004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regression calibration to correct correlated errors in outcome and exposure.
    Shaw PA; He J; Shepherd BE
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 33086428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement error adjustment in essential fatty acid intake from a food frequency questionnaire: alternative approaches and methods.
    Beydoun MA; Kaufman JS; Ibrahim J; Satia JA; Heiss G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Sep; 7():41. PubMed ID: 17868465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.