These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9007585)

  • 1. The Mel Scale's disqualifying bias and a consistency of pitch-difference equisections in 1956 with equal cochlear distances and equal frequency ratios.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1997 Jan; 103(1-2):199-224. PubMed ID: 9007585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A psychophysical pitch function determined by absolute magnitude estimation and its relation to the musical pitch scale.
    Miśkiewicz A; Rakowski A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):987-92. PubMed ID: 22280721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical bandwidth and consonance in relation to cochlear frequency-position coordinates.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 54(2):164-208. PubMed ID: 1938625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dead regions and pitch perception.
    Huss M; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3841-52. PubMed ID: 16018486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical bandwidth and consonance: their operational definitions in relation to cochlear nonlinearity and combination tones.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 54(2):209-46. PubMed ID: 1938626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harmonic fusion and pitch affinity: Is there a direct link?
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():247-254. PubMed ID: 26341475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning to perceive pitch differences.
    Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11931315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
    Dorman MF; Spahr T; Gifford R; Loiselle L; McKarns S; Holden T; Skinner M; Finley C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 17351713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local improvement in auditory frequency discrimination is associated with hearing-loss slope in subjects with cochlear damage.
    Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Norena A; Collet L
    Brain; 2002 Mar; 125(Pt 3):524-37. PubMed ID: 11872610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Place code for pitch: a necessary revision.
    Zwislocki JJ; Nguyen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 119(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10320063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Off-frequency listening in subjects with chronic tinnitus.
    Kiani F; Yoganantha U; Tan CM; Meddis R; Schaette R
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():1-10. PubMed ID: 24012951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pure tone discrimination with cochlear implants and filter-band spread.
    Wagner L; Altindal R; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20236. PubMed ID: 34642437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination.
    Micheyl C; Delhommeau K; Perrot X; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):36-47. PubMed ID: 16839723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of pitch matching for pure tones and for complex tones with overlapping or nonoverlapping harmonics.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Proctor GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3443-50. PubMed ID: 1619120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave enlargement effect.
    McKinney MF; Delgutte B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2679-92. PubMed ID: 10573885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.