BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9007653)

  • 21. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in rural South African women.
    Schneider H; Coetzee DJ; Fehler HG; Bellingan A; Dangor Y; Radebe F; Ballard RC
    Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Jun; 74 Suppl 1():S147-52. PubMed ID: 10023366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
    Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female New Zealand university students.
    Baker M; Ortega-Benito J; Garret N; Bromhead C; Leslie K; MacDonald J; McNicholas A
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1220):U1607. PubMed ID: 16132068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Prevalence of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a female population seeking contraception counseling].
    Boisvert R; Côté A; Poulin M; Lefebvre J
    CMAJ; 1993 Jan; 148(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 8420657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
    Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
    van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in secondary schools, family planning and occupational health centres in Luxembourg.
    Mossong J; Muller M; Majéry N; Mardaga C; Decruyenaere F; Schneider F
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Oct; 85(6):455-8. PubMed ID: 19574242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening male prisoners for Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on test positivity among women from their neighborhoods who were tested in family planning clinics.
    Peterman TA; Newman DR; Goldberg M; Anschuetz GL; Salmon M; Satterwhite CL; Berman SM
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jul; 36(7):425-9. PubMed ID: 19525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women seeking termination of pregnancy 1985-2000].
    Bakken IJ; Skjeldestad FE; Nordbø SA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Jun; 124(12):1638-40. PubMed ID: 15229710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. To screen or not to screen?
    Carroll JC
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():97-102. PubMed ID: 8435566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in college women with a polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Cook RL; St George K; Lassak M; Tran N; Anhalt JP; Rinaldo CR
    Clin Infect Dis; 1999 May; 28(5):1002-7. PubMed ID: 10452625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Chlamydia trachomatis in family planning. Is screening necessary?].
    Guerreiro D; Borrego MJ; Teles Lda C; Catry MD
    Acta Med Port; 1996; 9(4-6):151-6. PubMed ID: 9005688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
    van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening pregnant women for chlamydia: what are the predictors of infection?
    Chen MY; Fairley CK; De Guingand D; Hocking J; Tabrizi S; Wallace EM; Grover S; Gurrin L; Carter R; Pirotta M; Garland S
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Feb; 85(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18708481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
    Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis in a population attending a family planning center].
    Rosales M; Domínguez V; Bonacho I; Vidal X
    Rev Clin Esp; 1993 May; 192(9):424-7. PubMed ID: 8516506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chlamydia trachomatis infections among women attending prenatal clinics: United States, 2004-2009.
    Satterwhite CL; Gray AM; Berman S; Weinstock H; Kleinbaum D; Howards PP
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Jun; 39(6):416-20. PubMed ID: 22592825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Cervicitis--epidemiological and clinical risk for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in university students].
    Schilling A; Stevenson M
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 7659820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a California collegiate population.
    Sipkin DL; Gillam A; Grady LB
    J Am Coll Health; 2003; 52(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 14765760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. CDC Grand Rounds: Chlamydia prevention: challenges and strategies for reducing disease burden and sequelae.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Apr; 60(12):370-3. PubMed ID: 21451447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.