These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9007922)

  • 1. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.
    Scaf G; Lurie AG; Mosier KM; Kantor ML; Ramsby GR; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jan; 83(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 9007922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 7835511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chau AC; Fung K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device.
    Mah JK; Danforth RA; Bumann A; Hatcher D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 14561979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8593910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant diagnostics utilizing computed tomography imaging.
    Hall SR
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 1995; 85(3):19-24. PubMed ID: 9526233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques.
    Clark DE; Danforth RA; Barnes RW; Burtch ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 2098559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography.
    Bianchi J; Goggins W; Rudolph M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 10936846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized tomography for implant treatment planning.
    Amet EM
    J Kans Dent Assoc; 1998; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 9800552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from tomography for dental implant installation. Spiral tomography using the Scanora technique compared with hypocycloidal tomography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 1397458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absorbed radiation doses during tomographic examinations in dental implant planning: a study in humans.
    Zenóbio EG; Zenóbio MA; Nogueira MS; Silva TA; Shibli JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 20491821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Clark DE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jan; 75(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 8419871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Low-dose computerized tomography of the jaw bone in pre-implantation diagnosis. Limits of dose reduction and accuracy of distance measurements].
    Hassfeld S; Streib S; Sahl H; Stratmann U; Fehrentz D; Zöller J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 Jul; 2(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 9738367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic techniques for presurgical assessment of dental implant sites.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NH; Goshorn BI
    Gen Dent; 1992; 40(6):502-5, 509-10. PubMed ID: 1298675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative radiographic evaluation of implant sites by computed tomography. Radiation dose profiles.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Henrikson CO; Cederlund T
    Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(6):213-9. PubMed ID: 7725235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants.
    Duckmanton NA; Austin BW; Lechner SK; Klineberg IJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8179788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.