These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9009422)

  • 1. Tissue response to space closure in monkeys: a comparison of orthodontic magnets and superelastic coil springs.
    Linder-Aronson A; Forsberg CM; Rygh P; Lindskog S
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):581-8. PubMed ID: 9009422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthodontic magnets. A study of force and field pattern, biocompatibility and clinical effects.
    Bondemark L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1994; 99():1-148. PubMed ID: 7801229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Force-distance relation and properties of repelling Sm-Co5 magnets in orthodontic clinical use: an experimental model.
    Bondemark L; Kurol J
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 100(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 1439528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Force generation by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Bonds PW; Johnson BE
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):191-4; discussion 195-6. PubMed ID: 1416238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic magnets: effects on gingival epithelium and alveolar bone in monkeys.
    Linder-Aronson A; Lindskog S; Rygh P
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 14(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 1516657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repelling magnets versus super elastic nickel-titanium coils.
    Blechman AM
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7726466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proximal alveolar bone level after orthodontic treatment with magnets, superelastic coils and straight-wire appliances.
    Bondemark L; Kurol J
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 9046394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Superelastic nickel titanium coil springs.
    Ryan A
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Nov; 22(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 8580107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coating failure of commercial orthodontic magnets and DNA fragmentation of oral mucosa cells.
    Abdel-Kader HM; Aref MI; Hussein FA
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 May; 24(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 18649562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of samarium-cobalt magnets and pulsed electromagnetic fields on tooth movement.
    Darendeliler MA; Sinclair PM; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):578-88. PubMed ID: 7771362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nickel-titanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques.
    Erverdi N; Koyutürk O; Küçükkeles N
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9088603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of clodronate on early alveolar bone remodeling and root resorption related to orthodontic forces: a histomorphometric analysis.
    Choi J; Baek SH; Lee JI; Chang YI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):548.e1-8; discussion 548-9. PubMed ID: 21055592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Ehring C; Morton D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corrosion under static and dynamic conditions of alloys used for magnetic retention in dentistry.
    Angelini E; Pezzoli M; Zucchi F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):848-53. PubMed ID: 2072334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars.
    Bondemark L; Kurol J; Bernhold M
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 8060015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of orthodontic magnets on cutaneous epithelial thickness and tibial bone growth in rats.
    Linder-Aronson A; Rygh P; Lindskog S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Aug; 53(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 7484110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An adjustment in NiTi closed coil spring for an extended range of activation.
    Ravipati RR; Sivakumar A; Sudhakar P; Padmapriya CV; Bhaskar M; Azharuddin M
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 25745719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extent and flux density of static magnetic fields generated by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets.
    Bondemark L; Kurol J; Wisten A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 May; 107(5):488-96. PubMed ID: 7733058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical investigation of force delivery systems for orthodontic space closure.
    Nightingale C; Jones SP
    J Orthod; 2003 Sep; 30(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 14530421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of NiTi Superelastic Retraction Coil Springs for orthodontic tooth movement in rats.
    Rozman J; Mrvar P; Drevenšek M; Pečlin P
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(6):339-48. PubMed ID: 21263180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.