These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9009881)

  • 1. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1231-42. PubMed ID: 14710958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):471-81. PubMed ID: 10909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW; Heinke D; Cooper AC
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):540-60. PubMed ID: 12132757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 11521854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When a reappearance is old news: visual marking survives occlusion.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):185-98. PubMed ID: 12669757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. History matters: the preview benefit in search is not onset capture.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Mar; 14(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 12661682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
    Osugi T; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The encoding process of nonconfigural information in contextual cuing.
    Ogawa H; Kumada T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18372753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional selection by distractor suppression.
    Caputo G; Guerra S
    Vision Res; 1998 Mar; 38(5):669-89. PubMed ID: 9604099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):946-62. PubMed ID: 9627427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.
    Hodsoll J; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):918-26. PubMed ID: 11521856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.