These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9011691)

  • 1. Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.
    Farrar DJ; Hill JD; Pennington DG; McBride LR; Holman WL; Kormos RL; Esmore D; Gray LA; Seifert PE; Schoettle GP; Moore CH; Hendry PJ; Bhayana JN
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1997 Jan; 113(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 9011691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival after biventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.
    Cleveland JC; Naftel DC; Reece TB; Murray M; Antaki J; Pagani FD; Kirklin JK
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Aug; 30(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 21621423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of biventricular and left ventricular assist devices for the management of severe right ventricular dysfunction in patients with end-stage heart failure.
    Aissaoui N; Morshuis M; Paluszkiewicz L; Lauenroth V; Börgermann J; Gummert J
    ASAIO J; 2014; 60(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 24727535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device support for severe right heart failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion.
    Takeda K; Naka Y; Yang JA; Uriel N; Colombo PC; Jorde UP; Takayama H
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2014 Feb; 33(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 23932442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of contemporary mechanical circulatory support device configurations in patients with severe biventricular failure.
    Levin AP; Jaramillo N; Garan AR; Takeda K; Takayama H; Yuzefpolskaya M; Mancini DM; Naka Y; Colombo PC; Topkara VK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 151(2):530-5.e2. PubMed ID: 26651960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biventricular Berlin Heart EXCOR pediatric use across the united states.
    Zafar F; Jefferies JL; Tjossem CJ; Bryant R; Jaquiss RD; Wearden PD; Rosenthal DN; Cabrera AG; Rossano JW; Humpl T; Morales DL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Apr; 99(4):1328-34. PubMed ID: 25704863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery of right heart function with temporary right ventricular assist using a centrifugal pump in patients with severe biventricular failure.
    Saito S; Sakaguchi T; Miyagawa S; Nishi H; Yoshikawa Y; Fukushima S; Daimon T; Sawa Y
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Aug; 31(8):858-64. PubMed ID: 22609185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of total artificial heart and biventricular assist device support as bridge-to-transplantation.
    Cheng A; Trivedi JR; Van Berkel VH; Massey HT; Slaughter MS
    J Card Surg; 2016 Oct; 31(10):648-653. PubMed ID: 27573150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results of primary biventricular support: an analysis of data from the EUROMACS registry.
    Vierecke J; Gahl B; de By TMMH; Antretter H; Beyersdorf F; Caliskan K; Krachak V; Loforte A; Potapov E; Schoenrath F; Stockman B; Vanderheyden M; Meyns B; Gummert J; Mohacsi P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Dec; 56(6):1037-1045. PubMed ID: 31369075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicenter experience with durable biventricular assist devices.
    Shah P; Ha R; Singh R; Cotts W; Adler E; Kiernan M; Brambatti M; Meehan K; Phillips S; Kidambi S; Macaluso GP; Banerjee D; Mooney D; Pham D; Pretorius VD
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2018 Sep; 37(9):1093-1101. PubMed ID: 30173824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical cardiac support in children with congenital heart disease with intention to bridge to heart transplantation†.
    De Rita F; Hasan A; Haynes S; Crossland D; Kirk R; Ferguson L; Peng E; Griselli M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 46(4):656-62; discussion 662. PubMed ID: 24578411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discharge outcomes in patients with paracorporeal biventricular assist devices.
    Thomas SS; Smallwood J; Smith CM; Griffin LM; Shekar P; Chen FY; Couper GS; Givertz MM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Mar; 97(3):894-900. PubMed ID: 24280185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.
    John R; Pagani FD; Naka Y; Boyle A; Conte JV; Russell SD; Klodell CT; Milano CA; Rogers J; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 20447659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device.
    Fitzpatrick JR; Frederick JR; Hiesinger W; Hsu VM; McCormick RC; Kozin ED; Laporte CM; O'Hara ML; Howell E; Dougherty D; Cohen JE; Southerland KW; Howard JL; Paulson EC; Acker MA; Morris RJ; Woo YJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 137(4):971-7. PubMed ID: 19327526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biventricular assist device-induced right ventricular reverse structural and functional remodeling.
    Klotz S; Naka Y; Oz MC; Burkhoff D
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1195-201. PubMed ID: 16143233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes in Patients Bridged With Univentricular and Biventricular Devices in the Modern Era of Heart Transplantation.
    Grimm JC; Sciortino CM; Magruder JT; Dungan SP; Valero V; Sharma K; Tedford RJ; Russell SD; Whitman GJ; Silvestry SC; Shah AS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jul; 102(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 27068177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Success rates of long-term circulatory assist devices used currently for bridge to heart transplantation.
    Arabia FA; Smith RG; Rose DS; Arzouman DA; Sethi GK; Copeland JG
    ASAIO J; 1996; 42(5):M542-6. PubMed ID: 8944938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist devices on allosensitization in adults: A comparison with left ventricular assist devices.
    Chaidaroglou A; Armenis I; Gkouziouta A; Bonios MJ; Kogerakis N; Fragoulis S; Leontiadis E; Zarkalis D; Stavridis G; Kaklamanis L; Adamopoulos S; Degiannis D
    Transpl Immunol; 2021 Dec; 69():101477. PubMed ID: 34600071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Single-Institutional Experience with 36 Children Smaller Than 5 Kilograms Supported with the Berlin Heart Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) over 12 Years: Comparison of Patients with Biventricular versus Functionally Univentricular Circulation.
    Bleiweis MS; Philip J; Peek GJ; Stukov Y; Janelle GM; Pitkin AD; Sullivan KJ; Nixon CS; Sharaf OM; Neal D; Jacobs JP
    World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg; 2023 Mar; 14(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 36798022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biventricular cannulation is superior regarding hemodynamics and organ recovery in patients on biventricular assist device support.
    Schlensak C; Schibilsky D; Siepe M; Brehm K; Klemm R; von Wattenwyl R; Berchthold-Herz M; Benk C; Beyersdorf F
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1011-7. PubMed ID: 21489816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.